Adobe Portfolio vs Framer: Comprehensive comparison guide for 2024

Final verdict


Adobe Portfolio and Framer both offer unique strengths, catering to different user needs and preferences.


  • Adobe Portfolio (Overall Grade: 5.5/10)

    is tailored for creative professionals looking to showcase their work with minimal fuss. It excels in ease of use, making it an excellent choice for photographers, graphic designers, and artists who want a straightforward, visually appealing platform. However, it lacks ecommerce capabilities and advanced customization options, which may limit its appeal for users seeking more robust features.

  • Framer (Overall Grade: 7.1/10)

    stands out with its AI-driven design tools, extensive customization options, and robust website speed optimization. It is ideal for users who need a versatile platform with advanced design and prototyping features. While it has a steeper learning curve and lacks native ecommerce features, its integration capabilities and comprehensive component library make it a powerful tool for both novice and experienced designers.

Best for ecommerce

0.0
5.9


Verdict

: Adobe Portfolio is not suitable for ecommerce, while Framer, with its integration capabilities, offers basic ecommerce functionalities.


  • Adobe Portfolio

    : Adobe Portfolio is designed for creative professionals to showcase their work and does not offer any ecommerce features. It is ideal for photographers, graphic designers, and artists looking to build a professional online presence without the need for selling products online.

  • Framer

    : Framer, although not inherently equipped with ecommerce features, can integrate with Ecwid to add online store functionalities. This makes it a more viable option for those needing basic ecommerce capabilities. However, it still lacks the depth and scalability of dedicated ecommerce platforms.

Best for informational & business websites

7.4
7.5


Verdict

: When comparing Adobe Portfolio vs Framer, both platforms are strong contenders for creating informational and business websites, but Framer slightly edges out Adobe Portfolio due to its advanced design functionalities and better hosting quality.


  • Adobe Portfolio

    : Adobe Portfolio is tailored for creative professionals who want to showcase their work with minimal fuss. It offers a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with Adobe Creative Cloud, making it easy to import and display creative projects. However, it may lack some of the advanced design and customization features that Framer offers, making it more suitable for users who prioritize simplicity and ease of use.

  • Framer

    : Framer provides a robust set of tools for creating interactive and responsive designs, making it ideal for both novices and experienced designers. Its extensive customization options, real-time collaboration features, and AI-driven design tools make it a versatile choice for various project sizes and budgets. While it has a steeper learning curve, its advanced features and better hosting quality make it a strong choice for those looking to create polished, user-centric websites.

Detailed comparison

Design functionalities & templates

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
7.4
8.5

🏆

Winner: Framer.

If you’re looking for a platform that offers more creative control, a wide array of design features, and a larger selection of templates, Framer is the preferred choice.

Adobe Portfolio offers a selection of customizable templates designed for creatives across various fields, such as photography, graphic design, and web design. These templates are responsive and tailored to showcase creative work effectively across all devices.


Adobe Portfolio Themes

Adobe Portfolio themes
Adobe Portfolio theme example

On the other hand, Framer offers a diverse array of over 1,000 customizable website templates and designs, catering to various industries and project requirements. It stands out for its robust design and prototyping features, including responsive design capabilities, real-time collaboration, and extensive import options from other design tools.


Framer Themes

Framer templates
Framer template example

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Ease of use

Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:

  • Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
  • Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
  • User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
  • Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.7
7.1


🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio

. With a score of 8.7, Adobe Portfolio is designed with a user-friendly interface that caters to creatives looking to showcase their work with minimal fuss. Framer, scoring 7.1, offers an intuitive interface but may present a learning curve for complete beginners due to its advanced animation and interaction features.


Learning Resources


🏆 Winner: Tie

. Both Adobe Portfolio and Framer offer extensive and varied learning resources. Adobe Portfolio provides detailed tutorials and articles covering a broad spectrum of topics, while Framer offers detailed courses and lessons on Framer Academy, covering essential topics like scroll animations, CMS, and localization.

For ecommerce

EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:

  • Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
  • Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
  • Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
  • Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
  • Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
0.0
5.9

Adobe Portfolio, designed for creative professionals to showcase their work, does not offer any ecommerce capabilities. On the other hand, Framer, while not having native ecommerce features, can be integrated with Ecwid’s free shopping cart extension to add online store functionalities. This gives Framer a slight edge in the ecommerce category.

Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

Ecommerce themes and templates

0.0

7.0

Product page customization

0.0

5.5

Payment processing and commissions

0.0

6.5

POS capabilities

0.0

3.0

Payment gateways

0.0

6.0

Product numbers

0.0

6.0

Additional ecommerce features

0.0

5.5

Adobe Portfolio ecommerce features:

Adobe Portfolio does not have any ecommerce features.

Framer ecommerce features:

  • Ecwid integration

Ecommerce themes & templates

Adobe Portfolio does not have any ecommerce specific templates. In contrast, Framer offers 97 website templates specifically designed for ecommerce, providing a wide range of options for various business needs. These templates are highly customizable, allowing for easy adjustments to colors, fonts, layouts, and integration with essential ecommerce tools. Both free and paid options are available, catering to businesses of all sizes looking to enhance their online presence and sales capabilities.

Product page customization

Adobe Portfolio does not have product page customization features. Framer, on the other hand, primarily focuses on expanding design possibilities for ecommerce. However, it lacks inherent ecommerce functionalities and instead heavily depends on integrating with platforms such as Shopify and Ecwid. Additionally, while Framer allows for some customization of product pages, these modifications are generally limited to design and layout alterations.

Payment processing

Adobe Portfolio does not have any payment processing capabilities. Framer supports Stripe for payment processing, enabling a wide range of payment options including one-time payments, subscriptions, and more, without requiring coding. While specific transaction fees were not mentioned, such fees typically depend on Stripe’s pricing. Framer’s focus is on online transactions and ecommerce integrations, and there’s no explicit mention of native POS functionality. For the most current details on fees and features, it’s recommended to consult directly with Framer or Stripe.

Website Editors

Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:

  • Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
  • Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
  • Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
  • Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.4
7.6

🏆

Winner: Framer

. Framer, with a score of 7.6, offers a robust set of tools for creating interactive and responsive designs, including a wide array of pre-built components, real-time collaboration features, and the ability to integrate with other design tools and workflows. Users can leverage Framer’s editor to craft detailed animations, fine-tune interactions, and test their designs across various screen sizes and devices. Additionally, its code export feature allows for seamless transition from design to development, making it a versatile choice for teams aiming to create polished, user-centric websites.

Framer editor

Adobe Portfolio’s editor, scoring 7.4, is designed for creatives to showcase their work. With it, users can easily create and customize their own professional-looking websites without needing to code. The editor allows for the integration of high-quality images and videos, offers a variety of responsive templates tailored to different creative fields, and provides seamless Adobe Creative Cloud integration, enabling users to directly import their work. Additionally, Adobe Portfolio supports custom domain names and offers access to Adobe Fonts, enhancing the aesthetic appeal and functionality of the user’s website.

Adobe Portfolio editor

Mobile editor/app

0
4.5

🏆

Winner: Framer

. Both Adobe Portfolio and Framer have limited mobile editing capabilities. Adobe Portfolio does not offer a mobile editor app, which means users cannot make changes to their websites on the go. On the other hand, Framer does not have a dedicated mobile editor app, but it does allow users to modify their websites using a mobile browser. However, this comes with certain restrictions and is notably inconvenient.

Framer, despite these limitations, is the winner in this category as it at least provides some form of mobile editing capability, unlike Adobe Portfolio.

Product testing options

Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:

  • Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
  • Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
  • Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
  • Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
7.6
6.2


Overall Result

:

Adobe Portfolio wins

. Adobe Portfolio scores 7.6, offering a trial version that allows users to explore all features and even create a portfolio website. However, users cannot publish their website without subscribing to a plan. Additionally, users can test the features further during the 14-day refundable period. On the other hand, Framer scores 6.2, offering a free version that allows testing of some features. However, it does not offer a trial version and only provides a money-back guarantee in some regions.

Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

Free Plan
No Yes

Trial Version

Yes
No

Testing Premium Features

Yes, during trial and refundable period
Limited, with free version

Money Back Guarantee

14-day money back guarantee
Only in some regions

Price

PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:

  • Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
  • Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
  • Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
  • Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
7.7
7.7


Adobe Portfolio and Framer have similar pricing scores, but Framer offers a wider range of plans and a discount for annual billing.

Adobe Portfolio Logo


Offerings

Framer Logo


Offerings


Free
No offering at this amount.

Free (Free/month):

Allows 3 websites built on a framer.website subdomain with Framer branding in the footer. Limited to 1,000 traffic visitors and 1,000 CMS items.


$5-$15

Creative Cloud – Photography ($9.99/month):

Up to 5 Portfolio sites with fonts from Adobe Fonts, and with access to Photoshop and Lightroom and 20GB storage.

Value for price:


7.0


Mini ($10/month):

Removes Framer branding, allows using a custom domain, includes collaboration with an additional cost for extra editors, custom code embedding, e-commerce support, and limited CMS items. Offers a monthly visitor limit of 2,000 and 1GB bandwidth.

Value for price:


6.5


$10-$20
No offering at this amount.

Basic ($20/month):

Offers all Mini features plus increased limits for CMS items (1,000) and traffic (10,000 visitors per month), along with 10GB bandwidth.

Value for price:


7.5


$30+

Creative Cloud – All Apps ($59.99/month):

Up to 5 Portfolio sites with the entire collection of Adobe creative apps, including Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign, with 20 GB storage.

Value for price:


8.5


Pro ($30/month):

Enhances Basic plan features with a significant increase in CMS items (10,000), traffic (100,000 visitors per month), and bandwidth (100GB), among other advanced features.

Value for price:


8.5

In some cases companies have different prices based on various components like a
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.

Hosting quality

Hosting
quality
Examines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:

  • Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
  • Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
  • Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
  • Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
7.0
7.1

🏆

Winner: Framer

Both Adobe Portfolio and Framer offer cloud hosting included in their plans. However, Framer edges out with a 99.9% uptime and an uptime guarantee for enterprise plans. It also has more global data centers, providing potentially better site performance for international users. Adobe Portfolio does not publish its uptime statistics and does not provide an uptime guarantee, which makes Framer a more reliable choice for hosting.

Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

Do they offer hosting?

Yes, included in all paid plans

Yes, included in all paid plans

Data Centers:

3 globally: US, Ireland and Japan

4 globally: 2 in US, 1 in Ireland, 1 in Singapore

Type of hosting:

Cloud Hosting

Cloud Hosting

Uptime:

Not published

99.9%

Uptime Guarantee:

No

Yes, 99.99% for enterprise plan

Website Speed Optimization

Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:

  • PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
  • Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
  • Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
  • Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
  • CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
6.2
7.4


🏆 Winner: Framer

Both Adobe Portfolio and Framer prioritize website performance and page speed, but Framer has a higher Website Speed Optimization score.

Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

Focus

Image optimization, SEO and Meta Tag Configurations

Code Minification, Pre-Rendering, Caching, Image optimization

Performance Tools

Not specified

Not specified

Key Strategies

Image optimization, SEO and Meta Tag Configurations

Code Minification, Pre-Rendering, Caching, Image optimization

Load Times

Varies depending on design choices and content volume

Varies depending on optimization and website complexity

Page Speed Scores Range

Not specified

Not specified

Core Web Vitals Improvement

Not disclosed

Emphasis on LCP, FID, CLS improvements

Framer’s approach to enhancing site speed includes code minification, pre-rendering, caching, and image optimization. These strategies, combined with an emphasis on improving Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID, CLS), give Framer an edge in website speed optimization.

On the other hand, Adobe Portfolio focuses on image optimization and SEO and Meta Tag Configurations to enhance site speed. However, Adobe Portfolio does not disclose any information about its Core Web Vitals improvements, which could be a potential area for improvement.

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Plugins and integrations

Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:

  • Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
  • Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
  • Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
  • Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
6.7
7.6


🏆 Winner: Framer.

Framer, with a score of 7.6, offers a variety of plugins that cater to different needs such as forms, video & animation, social media integration, audio, and utility functions. These plugins include integrations with platforms like Vimeo, MP4, Lottie, GIPHY, Instagram, Twitter, Google Maps, Trustpilot, Spotify, SoundCloud, Apple Music, and more. The plugins are designed to enhance the functionality of websites created with Framer, allowing users to drag and drop these features onto their web pages, customize them, and connect them to their content or service.

On the other hand, Adobe Portfolio, scoring 6.7, integrates with several Adobe services like Behance, Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Stock, and Adobe Fonts to enhance user experience by allowing seamless sharing, updating, and showcasing of creative work. These integrations are designed to be user-friendly and aim to provide additional customization and management options for online portfolios. The services are included with Adobe Portfolio, which is available at no extra cost to Creative Cloud subscribers.

Marketing Features

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
3.7
7.2

🏆

Overall Winner: Framer

. Framer offers more comprehensive marketing features, including email marketing and blogging, which are not available in Adobe Portfolio. However, both platforms lack ads and promotions features.

Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

SEO Tools







Email Marketing







Blogging







Social Media Integration

Limited




Analytics and Reporting

Google Analytics integration

Available on higher plans

Ads and Promotions






Customer Support

Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:

  • Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
  • Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
  • Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
  • Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
7.3
5.6


🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio

. In the comparison of Adobe Portfolio vs Framer, Adobe Portfolio takes the lead with a customer support score of 7.3. Adobe Portfolio offers a variety of support options, including live chat, phone support, and a comprehensive knowledge base. This ensures that users have multiple avenues to seek help, whether they prefer self-service or direct assistance.

Framer, on the other hand, has a customer support score of 5.6. It primarily relies on self-help resources such as a community forum and a knowledge base. While users can email Framer’s support team, the lack of detailed information about their availability and working hours can be a drawback for those needing immediate assistance.

Security

SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:

  • Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
  • SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
  • Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
  • Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
8.1
8.2

🏆

Winner: Framer

. Framer edges out Adobe Portfolio with a slightly higher security score. Framer’s commitment to data security is evident in its use of Amazon Web Services for hosting and data encryption, strict access controls, and isolated environments for different stages of development. Framer also emphasizes product security with secure development practices, external security testing, and a bug bounty program.

Adobe Portfolio also prioritizes user and customer data security, implementing comprehensive data protection measures aligned with major regulatory frameworks. It offers basic website security measures such as SSL certificates and the option to password protect the entire website or specific pages. However, it falls slightly short of Framer’s extensive security measures.

AI Capabilities

AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:

  • Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
  • Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
  • AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
  • Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0
7.6
Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

AI Builder




Framer’s AI builder simplifies the process of creating and optimizing web content

AI Ecommerce features







AI content generation




Framer’s AI enhances website creation with features like AI Translation, Text Rewrite, and Headline Generator

Additional AI features




Framer’s AI Style and AI Photo Generating and Editing tools offer a high degree of customization and instant image creation and editing capabilities


🏆 Winner: Framer

. Framer, with a score of 7.6, offers several AI capabilities that Adobe Portfolio lacks. These include an AI builder, content generation, and additional features like AI Style and AI Photo Generating and Editing tools. These features make Framer a more versatile and efficient choice for website design and management.

Framer AI feature

User Management

User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:

  • Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
    permissions.
  • Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
  • Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
    levels.
  • Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
3.0
7.4


🏆 Winner: Framer

. Adobe Portfolio and Framer have different approaches to user management.

  • Adobe Portfolio allows only one user to build and edit a website.
  • Framer supports team collaboration with different plans allowing a varying number of editors; the Team Basic plan allows up to 5 editors, while the Team Pro plan supports up to 10 editors. These plans come with additional features like live collaboration, comments, file storage, and extended version history.

Framer User Roles and Access Levels:

Role Description Access Highlights
Designer Focuses on the aesthetic and UI/UX aspects of the website. Can create and modify design elements, utilize animation libraries like Framer Motion, and implement accessibility settings.
Content Editor Manages and curates content for the website, including text, images, and other media. Can edit CMS content, use localization features for different regions, and modify SEO settings.
Developer Works on more technical aspects, such as custom code and integrations. Has access to deploy options, can use custom domains, manage project permissions, and apply custom code for further optimization.
Project Manager Oversees the project, coordinating between different roles and ensuring the project meets its deadlines and goals. Can invite collaborators, assign roles and permissions, and manage versions and rollbacks for efficient site management.
Collaborator (General) A role that can encompass various levels of access based on project needs, including design, content, and deployment tasks. Access can be customized to include a mix of design, content, and deploy permissions based on the project’s needs and the individual’s role within the team.

Additional Features

Adobe Portfolio Logo
Framer Logo

SSL Certificate







Custom Domain







Free Custom Domain Included







International Domains







Mobile Responsive







Page Speed







Website Builder Mobile App







Convert a Website To An App







Website Analytics







Multilingual Sites







Multiple Users


User Feedback

Adobe Portfolio
0 reviews
0 out of 5 stars
Framer
86 reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars

Adobe Portfolio is designed for creative professionals to showcase their work with ease. It offers a fully responsive, visually appealing website builder that integrates seamlessly with Adobe Creative Cloud. However, it lacks user feedback on platforms like G2, making it challenging to gauge user satisfaction comprehensively.

Framer, on the other hand, boasts a high rating of 4.5/5 on G2 from 86 reviews. Users praise its no-code approach, extensive tutorials, and AI-driven design features, which streamline the web design process. Despite some critiques regarding its learning curve and limited customer support, Framer is celebrated for enhancing creativity and efficiency in web development.

The making of this blog

We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.

FAQ

Which platform is better for creative professionals looking to showcase their work?

Adobe Portfolio is specifically designed for creative professionals such as photographers, graphic designers, and artists. It offers seamless integration with Adobe Creative Cloud, making it ideal for showcasing creative work.

Can I use Framer for ecommerce websites?

While Framer is not a dedicated ecommerce platform, it offers basic ecommerce functionalities through integration with solutions like Ecwid. This makes it suitable for users looking to add online store features to their websites.

Which platform offers better design and customization options?

Framer stands out for its extensive customization options and a larger selection of templates, catering to a wide range of industries and project requirements. It’s particularly noted for its AI-driven design capabilities.

Is Adobe Portfolio or Framer easier to use for beginners?

Adobe Portfolio is noted for its user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners, especially those already familiar with Adobe products. Framer offers an intuitive interface but may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features.

How do Adobe Portfolio and Framer compare in terms of pricing?

Both platforms offer similar pricing scores, but Framer provides a wider range of plans and a discount for annual billing, making it potentially more cost-effective depending on the user’s needs.

Which platform is more reliable for hosting?

Framer is considered more reliable for hosting, with a higher uptime guarantee and more global data centers, potentially offering better site performance for international users.

Are there any significant differences in website speed optimization between the two?

Framer has a slight edge in website speed optimization, focusing on strategies like code minification, pre-rendering, caching, and image optimization.

Which platform offers better customer support?

Adobe Portfolio scores higher in customer support, offering a comprehensive knowledge base, live chat, and phone support, making it easier for users to get help when needed.

How do the platforms compare in terms of security features?

Framer offers slightly more comprehensive security features, including data encryption, strict access controls, and a bug bounty program, providing a higher level of protection for user data.

Which platform is better for team collaboration and user management?

Framer supports team collaboration with different plans allowing varying numbers of editors and features like live collaboration and extended version history, making it more suitable for team projects.

Build your website in 1 minute

Share article

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your email address will never be published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Comment*

Name *