Final verdict
Adobe Portfolio and SubHub both offer specialized platforms, but they cater to different needs and audiences.
-
Adobe Portfolio (Overall Grade: 5.5/10)
is tailored for creative professionals looking to showcase their work. It excels in design functionalities and ease of use, making it an excellent choice for photographers, graphic designers, and artists. Adobe Portfolio’s integration with Adobe Creative Cloud and its user-friendly interface are significant advantages. However, it lacks ecommerce capabilities and advanced marketing tools, which limits its versatility compared to SubHub. -
SubHub (Overall Grade: 5.6/10)
is designed for creating and managing membership sites. It offers robust ecommerce features, including payment processing and product page customization, making it ideal for content creators and entrepreneurs looking to monetize their content. SubHub’s user management and marketing features are also strong points. However, it may not be as visually appealing or customizable as Adobe Portfolio, and its user interface might not be as intuitive for creative professionals.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Design functionalities & templates |
7.4 |
6.8 |
|
Ease of use |
8.7 |
7.7 |
|
Ecommerce |
0.0 |
5.9 |
|
Website Editors |
7.4 |
6.9 |
|
Product testing options |
7.6 |
7.0 |
|
Price |
7.7 |
6.8 |
|
Hosting quality |
7.0 |
5.5 |
|
Website speed optimization |
6.2 |
5.6 |
|
Plugins and integrations |
6.7 |
5.7 |
|
Marketing features |
3.7 |
5.7 |
|
Customer support |
7.3 |
6.3 |
|
Security |
8.1 |
4.0 |
|
User Management |
3.0 |
5.2 |
| Overall |
5.5 |
5.6 |
Best for ecommerce
0.0
5.9
Verdict
: Adobe Portfolio is not designed for ecommerce, making SubHub the better choice for those looking to sell products or manage memberships online.
-
Adobe Portfolio
: This platform is tailored for creative professionals to showcase their work and does not support ecommerce functionalities. It lacks features such as ecommerce themes, product page customization, and payment processing, making it unsuitable for online selling. -
SubHub
: Designed for membership sites, SubHub offers various ecommerce features, including the sale of physical and digital products, pay-per-view content, and integration with payment gateways like PayPal and Stripe. It provides customizable storefronts, inventory management, and flexible shipping options, making it a more viable option for ecommerce compared to Adobe Portfolio.
Best for informational & business websites
7.4
7.2
Verdict
: Adobe Portfolio is slightly better suited for informational and business websites compared to SubHub, thanks to its focus on creative professionals and seamless integration with Adobe Creative Cloud.
-
Adobe Portfolio
: Adobe Portfolio scores 7.4 in this category. It is designed for creative professionals like photographers, graphic designers, and artists. The platform offers a user-friendly interface and customizable templates that are fully responsive, making it easy to create visually appealing websites without coding. Its integration with Adobe Creative Cloud allows users to import and showcase their work effortlessly, making it an excellent choice for those looking to build a professional online presence. -
SubHub
: SubHub scores 7.2 and is tailored for creating and managing membership sites. It offers tools for setting up subscription models, managing member access, and providing exclusive content. While it is user-friendly and efficient for membership-based businesses, it may lack some advanced features needed for purely informational websites. SubHub is ideal for content creators and entrepreneurs looking to build a community and monetize their content.
Detailed comparison
Design functionalities & templates
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
7.4
6.8
🏆
Winner: Adobe Portfolio.
If you’re a creative professional looking for a platform that offers a high degree of personalization and customizable templates, Adobe Portfolio is the preferred choice.
Adobe Portfolio offers a selection of customizable templates designed for creatives across various fields, such as photography, graphic design, and web design. These templates are responsive and tailored to showcase creative work effectively across all devices.
Compared to Adobe Portfolio, SubHub offers a variety of customizable membership website templates designed to cater to different needs and themes. However, it does not offer a link to its themes page.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
No credit card required
Ease of use
Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:
- Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
- Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
- User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
- Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.7
7.7
🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio
. With a score of 8.7, Adobe Portfolio edges out SubHub, which scored 7.7. Adobe Portfolio’s user-friendly interface and seamless integration with Adobe Creative Cloud make it an excellent choice for creative professionals looking to showcase their work. SubHub, while user-friendly and efficient, is more tailored towards building membership websites and may lack some advanced features.
Learning Resources
🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio
. Adobe Portfolio offers extensive and varied learning resources, including detailed tutorials and interactive guides. SubHub also provides a range of learning resources, including video guides and a comprehensive FAQ section. However, Adobe Portfolio’s resources are more extensive and cover a broader spectrum of topics.
For ecommerce
EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:
- Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
- Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
- Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
- Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
- Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
0.0
5.9
Adobe Portfolio is not designed for ecommerce, as it lacks ecommerce capabilities, features, themes, templates, product page customization, and payment processing. It is primarily a platform for creative professionals to showcase their work.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ecommerce themes and templates |
0.0 |
3.0 |
|
Product page customization |
0.0 |
6.5 |
|
Payment processing and commissions |
0.0 |
7.0 |
|
POS capabilities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Payment gateways |
0.0 |
6.0 |
|
Product numbers |
0.0 |
5.0 |
|
Additional ecommerce features |
0.0 |
4.5 |
On the other hand, SubHub is designed for creating and managing membership sites, and it does support various ecommerce features. These include sales of physical goods, digital products, and pay-per-view content, with a customizable storefront and product categories. It offers flexible shipping and tax configurations, inventory management, and automatic order confirmation emails. However, it lacks support for distributing free products and does not manage the dispatch of physical goods, potentially requiring sellers to handle their shipping logistics.
SubHub ecommerce features:
- Paypal and Stripe integration
- Physical and Digital product listings
- Pay-per view products
SubHub does not have ecommerce specific templates, but it does offer a range of product page customization options. These include the ability to manage product variants, upload images, and set visibility preferences. Users can also implement SEO strategies through meta tags and manage tax settings. Additional functionalities include member-specific discounts, image carousels, and individualized shipping costs.
SubHub supports two main payment gateways: Stripe and PayPal. These integrations allow for secure payment processing for subscriptions and store items using debit or credit cards. The platform itself does not charge commissions on transactions.
In conclusion, if you are looking to build an ecommerce site, SubHub would be a better choice than Adobe Portfolio due to its ecommerce capabilities. However, it’s important to note that SubHub has its limitations and may not be suitable for all types of ecommerce businesses.
Website Editors
Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:
- Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
- Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
- Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
- Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.4
6.9
🏆
Winner: Adobe Portfolio
. Adobe Portfolio, with a score of 7.4, offers a user-friendly website builder editor designed for creatives to showcase their work. With it, users can easily create and customize their own professional-looking websites without needing to code. The editor allows for the integration of high-quality images and videos, offers a variety of responsive templates tailored to different creative fields, and provides seamless Adobe Creative Cloud integration, enabling users to directly import their work.
SubHub’s editor, scoring 6.9, is tailored for creating and managing membership sites, catering to content creators and entrepreneurs aiming to monetize their offerings. Its features encompass customizable templates, diverse content publishing options, and flexible subscription plans with seamless integration for recurring revenue through payment processors.
Mobile editor/app
0
4.0
🏆
Winner: SubHub
. Both Adobe Portfolio and SubHub have limited mobile editing capabilities. Adobe Portfolio does not have a mobile editor app, which means users cannot edit their websites on the go. On the other hand, SubHub allows users to manage some content on their website using the mobile browser version. However, it’s not possible to change the layout and design of the website on mobile. Despite its limitations, SubHub offers more mobile editing capabilities than Adobe Portfolio, making it the winner in this category.
Product testing options
Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:
- Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
- Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
- Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
- Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
7.6
7.0
Overall Result
: Adobe Portfolio scores slightly higher than SubHub with a score of 7.6 against 7.0. Adobe Portfolio offers a trial version where users can explore all features and even create a portfolio website. However, users cannot publish their website without subscribing to a plan. Additionally, users can test the features further during the 14-day refundable period. On the other hand, SubHub offers a 14-day free trial where users can test premium features. However, it only offers a 7-day money-back guarantee.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free Plan |
No | No |
|
Trial Duration |
Yes | 14 days |
|
Testing Premium Features |
During trial and refund period | During the free trial |
|
Money Back Guarantee |
14 days | 7 days |
Price
PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:
- Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
- Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
- Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
- Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
7.7
6.8
Adobe Portfolio and SubHub cater to different audiences, with Adobe Portfolio being more suitable for creative professionals and SubHub for those looking to create membership sites.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
$0-$10 |
Creative Cloud – Photography ($9.99/month): Up to 5 Portfolio sites with fonts from Adobe Fonts, and with access to Photoshop and Lightroom and 20GB storage. Value for price: 7.0 |
No offering at this amount. |
|
$40-$60 |
Creative Cloud – All Apps ($59.99/month): Up to 5 Portfolio sites with the entire collection of Adobe creative apps, including Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign, with 20 GB storage. Value for price: 8.5 |
Starter ($47/month): Up to 500 members, 5 GB storage, secure payment processing, course builder, 5 landing pages, e-commerce. Value for price: 6.5 |
|
$90-$100 |
No offering at this amount. |
Pro ($97/month): Up to 2000 members, 50 GB storage, removes SubHub branding, 15 landing pages, along with Starter features. Value for price: 7.5 |
|
$100+ |
No offering at this amount. |
Premium ($147/month): Unlimited members, 200 GB storage, email white labelling, 30 landing pages, plus all Pro features. Value for Price: 8.5 |
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.
Hosting quality
Hosting
qualityExamines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:
- Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
- Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
- Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
- Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
7.0
5.5
Winner: Adobe Portfolio
. Adobe Portfolio offers cloud hosting with 20GB of storage and data centers in the US, Ireland, and Japan. Although it doesn’t provide uptime statistics or guarantees, Adobe’s reputation suggests a high level of uptime. SubHub, on the other hand, offers managed cloud hosting with storage ranging from 5GB to 200GB, but doesn’t disclose its uptime statistics, guarantees, or data center locations. Adobe Portfolio’s transparency and reputation give it the edge in this category.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Do they offer hosting? |
Yes, included in all plans |
Yes, included in all plans |
|
Data Centers: |
3 globally: US, Ireland and Japan |
Not disclosed |
|
Type of hosting: |
Cloud Hosting |
Managed Cloud Hosting |
|
Uptime: |
Not published, but assumed high |
Not disclosed |
|
Uptime Guarantee: |
No |
No |
Website Speed Optimization
Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:
- PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
- Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
- Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
- Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
- CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
6.2
5.6
🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio
Both Adobe Portfolio and SubHub prioritize website performance and page speed, but Adobe Portfolio has a slightly higher Website Speed Optimization score.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Focus |
Image optimization, SEO, Meta Tag Configurations |
Image Optimization, Caching, Mobile Optimized design |
|
Performance Tools |
Not specified |
Not specified |
|
Key Strategies |
Image optimization, SEO and Meta Tag Configurations |
Image Optimization, Caching, Mobile Optimized design |
|
Load Times |
Varies depending on design choices and content volume |
Varies depending on optimization and website complexity |
|
Page Speed Scores Range |
Not specified |
Not specified |
|
Core Web Vitals Improvement |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Adobe Portfolio, designed for creative professionals, emphasizes on image optimization, SEO, and Meta Tag Configurations to optimize website speed. However, the load times and PageSpeed scores vary depending on specific design choices and content volume. Adobe Portfolio does not disclose any information about its Core Web Vitals improvements.
SubHub, designed for creating and managing membership sites, focuses on image optimization, caching, and mobile-optimized design for speed optimization. Similar to Adobe Portfolio, the load times and PageSpeed scores for SubHub vary depending on optimization and website complexity. SubHub does not provide any information on their Core Web Vitals improvements.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
No credit card required
Plugins and integrations
Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:
- Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
- Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
- Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
- Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
6.7
5.7
🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio.
Adobe Portfolio scores 6.7, offering a range of integrations specifically designed for creative professionals. These integrations, including Adobe services like Behance, Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Stock, and Adobe Fonts, allow users to seamlessly share, update, and showcase their creative work. On the other hand, SubHub, with a score of 5.7, offers a set of built-in features and limited third-party integrations primarily with MailChimp, Google Analytics, and payment gateways like Stripe and PayPal. While SubHub provides a comprehensive toolkit for creating and managing membership sites, its range of external integrations might be seen as limited compared to Adobe Portfolio.
Marketing Features
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
3.7
5.7
🏆
Overall Winner: SubHub
. SubHub stands out for its more comprehensive marketing tools, especially in email marketing, blogging, and ads and promotions. Adobe Portfolio, while offering basic SEO and analytics features, lacks in email marketing, blogging, and ads and promotions.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
SEO Tools |
Basic SEO features |
Comprehensive SEO features |
|
Email Marketing |
No |
Through integration of Mailchimp |
|
Blogging |
No |
Yes |
|
Social Media Integration |
Limited |
No |
|
Analytics and Reporting |
Through Google Analytics |
Through Google Analytics |
|
Ads and Promotions |
No |
Promotional codes and coupon codes |
Customer Support
Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:
- Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
- Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
- Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
- Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
7.3
6.3
🏆 Winner: Adobe Portfolio
. In the comparison of Adobe Portfolio vs SubHub, Adobe Portfolio takes the lead with a customer support score of 7.3. Adobe Portfolio offers a range of support options, including a comprehensive knowledge base, FAQs, live chat, and phone support. The emphasis on self-service help is beneficial for users who prefer finding solutions independently. Additionally, Adobe provides advanced 24/7 tech support for enterprise plans, ensuring that professional users have access to the assistance they need.
SubHub, with a customer support score of 6.3, provides support primarily through email and a support portal where users can submit detailed queries. While SubHub’s support system is accessible and responsive, it lacks the extensive resources and 24/7 availability that Adobe Portfolio offers. However, the platform’s focus on membership site management ensures that users receive targeted support for their specific needs.
Security
SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:
- Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
- SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
- Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
- Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
8.1
4.0
🏆
Winner: Adobe Portfolio
. Adobe Portfolio takes the lead in security with a score of 8.1 compared to SubHub’s 4.0. Adobe Portfolio implements comprehensive data protection measures aligned with major regulatory frameworks like the GDPR and U.S. state privacy laws. It also provides basic security measures such as SSL certificates and allows users to password protect their entire website or some pages.
On the other hand, SubHub’s approach to security is less detailed. While it emphasizes compliance with GDPR and CCPA regulations, it does not disclose any specific information about the website security measures it provides.
AI Capabilities
AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:
- Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
- Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
- AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
- Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0
0
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Personalized Design |
|
|
|
SEO Optimization |
|
|
|
Customer Behavior Analysis |
|
|
|
Sales Predictions |
|
|
|
Inventory Management |
|
|
|
Content Generation |
|
|
🏆 Winner: None
. Neither Adobe Portfolio nor SubHub offer AI capabilities. Both platforms focus on providing specific solutions for their target users – Adobe Portfolio for creative professionals and SubHub for membership-based businesses. However, they do not utilize AI to enhance the user experience or provide additional features.
User Management
User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:
- Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
permissions. - Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
- Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
levels. - Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
3.0
5.2
🏆 Winner: SubHub
. Adobe Portfolio and SubHub have different approaches to user management.
- Adobe Portfolio only allows one user to build and edit a website.
- SubHub allows multiple user accounts, however the platform does not specify the number of accounts supported.
SubHub User Roles and Access Levels:
| Role | Description | Access Highlights |
|---|---|---|
| Administrator | Full access to the platform except for Homepage and Course Editor. | Can manage all aspects of the platform, including content, store, and member management. |
| Content Management | Focuses on managing and organizing content within the platform. | Can access and manage content-related features but does not have access to Homepage or Course Editor. |
| Store (access only) | Specializes in handling the platform’s store features. | Limited to store management functions; no access to Homepage, Course Editor, or member management. |
| Member Manager (access only) | Oversees member accounts, roles, and subscriptions. | Can manage members and their subscriptions but cannot access Homepage, Course Editor, or store management. |
| Origin Admin Email | The initial administrator with the highest level of access, including Homepage and Course Editor. | Exclusive access to Homepage and Course Editor, on top of what the Administrator role provides. |
Additional Features
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
SSL Certificate |
|
|
|
Custom Domain |
|
|
|
Free Custom Domain Included |
|
|
|
International Domains |
|
|
|
Mobile Responsive |
|
|
|
Page Speed |
|
|
|
Website Builder Mobile App |
|
|
|
Convert a Website To An App |
|
|
|
Website Analytics |
|
|
|
Multilingual Sites |
|
|
|
Multiple Users |
|
|
User Feedback
Adobe Portfolio is designed for creative professionals to showcase their work with visually appealing, fully responsive websites. While specific user feedback is not available, its integration with Adobe Creative Cloud and ease of use make it a popular choice among photographers, graphic designers, and artists.
User feedback on SubHub presents a mix of positive and negative experiences, emphasizing the platform’s feature-rich environment and customizable templates. Users appreciate the flexibility and the quality of customer service, highlighting the platform’s continual updates and support as key benefits. However, some users express dissatisfaction with aspects such as the platform’s interface, lack of community features, and service fees for ticket resale. Concerns were also raised about the custom design service and mobile-friendly solutions taking longer than expected.
The making of this blog
We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.
FAQ
Which platform is better for creative professionals, Adobe Portfolio or SubHub?
Can I sell products or memberships on Adobe Portfolio?
Is Adobe Portfolio or SubHub easier to use?
Which platform offers better customer support, Adobe Portfolio or SubHub?
How do Adobe Portfolio and SubHub compare in terms of security?
Which platform is better for building a membership site?
Can I use my own domain with Adobe Portfolio and SubHub?
Which platform is more affordable, Adobe Portfolio or SubHub?
Build your website in 1 minute
Build your website in 1 minute
Tired of comparing? Try 10Web AI Website Builder and create your website in one minute.
