Google Sites vs Zenfolio: Comprehensive comparison guide for 2024

Final verdict


Google Sites vs Zenfolio: Both platforms cater to different user needs, with Google Sites excelling in ease of use and collaboration, while Zenfolio shines in ecommerce and design functionalities for photographers.


  • Google Sites (Overall Grade: 5.6/10)

    is a user-friendly website builder ideal for team projects, personal portfolios, and small business websites. It offers seamless integration with Google services, making it easy to create and manage websites without coding knowledge. However, it lacks built-in ecommerce features and advanced design customization options. Google Sites is best suited for users who prioritize ease of use and collaboration over extensive ecommerce capabilities.

  • Zenfolio (Overall Grade: 6.4/10)

    is a comprehensive platform designed specifically for photographers and visual artists. It offers a range of customizable templates, integrated ecommerce capabilities, and tools for marketing, client proofing, and secure photo storage. While it may have a steeper learning curve and less flexibility in design outside of photography-specific needs, Zenfolio is ideal for users looking to showcase, share, and sell their work online.

Best for ecommerce

1.8
6.3


Verdict

: Zenfolio is the clear winner for ecommerce, offering robust features tailored for photographers, while Google Sites lacks built-in ecommerce capabilities and relies on third-party integrations.


  • Google Sites

    : Google Sites is not designed for ecommerce. It lacks built-in ecommerce features, but users can integrate third-party tools or widgets to add ecommerce functionalities. This makes it less suitable for businesses looking for a seamless ecommerce experience.

  • Zenfolio

    : Zenfolio excels in ecommerce, especially for photographers and visual artists. It offers integrated ecommerce capabilities, including multiple currency support, discount coupons, order management, and secure payment options. This makes Zenfolio a comprehensive platform for selling products online.

Best for informational & business websites

7.2
6.9


Verdict

: Google Sites is better suited for general informational and business websites, while Zenfolio excels in providing specialized features for photographers and visual artists.


  • Google Sites

    : Google Sites offers a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with other Google services, making it an excellent choice for creating simple, collaborative informational websites. Its drag-and-drop functionality and ease of use score of 8.3 make it accessible for users with no coding experience. Google Sites is ideal for team projects, personal portfolios, and small business websites that require straightforward design and functionality.

  • Zenfolio

    : Zenfolio, with a score of 6.9, is tailored specifically for photographers and visual artists. It provides elegant, customizable templates and integrated e-commerce capabilities, allowing users to showcase and sell their work online. While it may not offer the same level of versatility for general informational websites, Zenfolio’s specialized tools for marketing, client proofing, and secure photo storage make it a powerful platform for managing and growing a photography business.

Detailed comparison

Design functionalities & templates

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
4.9
6.8

🏆

Winner: Zenfolio.

Zenfolio offers a more comprehensive platform for photographers and visual artists, with a higher score in design functionalities and templates.

Google Sites offers a limited number of templates suitable for various purposes, from personal blogs to business websites. These templates are designed for user engagement, simplicity, and functionality, allowing for customization to meet specific needs. However, compared to other website builders, Google Sites might offer less variety in templates and design customization options.


Google Sites Themes

Google Sites templates
Google Sites template example

On the other hand, Zenfolio offers a variety of customizable templates and features specifically tailored for photographers, with a focus on showcasing and selling their work. While it provides several customization options, including blocks for different layouts and styles, it may not offer as much versatility outside of photography-specific needs.


Zenfolio Themes

Zenfolio templates
Zenfolio website template

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Ease of use

Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:

  • Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
  • Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
  • User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
  • Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.3
6.3


🏆 Winner: Google Sites

. Scoring 8.3, Google Sites offers a user-friendly interface that allows individuals with no coding experience to create and publish websites easily. Zenfolio, with a score of 6.3, offers a specialized platform for photographers, but it has limitations in design flexibility and a complex dashboard. If ease of use is a priority, Google Sites is the clear winner in this category.


Learning Resources


🏆 Winner: Google Sites

. Google Sites offers a wide array of learning resources, spanning from practical guides for educators to comprehensive digital skill development programs for the wider public. Zenfolio’s learning resources are somewhat limited and users have expressed a desire for more comprehensive learning resources.

For ecommerce

EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:

  • Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
  • Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
  • Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
  • Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
  • Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
1.8
6.3

When it comes to ecommerce, Zenfolio clearly outperforms Google Sites. Zenfolio is designed specifically for photographers and visual artists, offering integrated ecommerce capabilities for selling prints, digital downloads, and other products directly through their website. Google Sites, on the other hand, is a simple website builder that doesn’t have built-in ecommerce features, but it allows for the integration of third-party tools and widgets for ecommerce functionalities.

Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

Ecommerce themes and templates

0.0

7.0

Product page customization

0.0

7.2

Payment processing and commissions

1.0

6.5

POS capabilities

0.0

3.0

Payment gateways

2.0

6.8

Product numbers

0.0

5.0

Additional ecommerce features

0.5

6.5

Google Sites ecommerce features:

Google Sites itself does not have built-in eCommerce features. However, you can integrate eCommerce functionalities into a Google Sites website by embedding third-party tools or widgets, linking to an external eCommerce platform, or using buttons that link to payment processors.

Zenfolio ecommerce features:

  • Multiple Currency Support
  • Discount Coupons
  • Order management
  • Gift Certificates
  • Tax management

Ecommerce themes & templates

Google Sites does not have any ecommerce templates. On the other hand, Zenfolio provides customizable website templates with integrated e-commerce features for photographers, designed to showcase and sell their work across various genres. These templates include essential online selling tools such as secure payment options, product management, and marketing integrations, making it an all-in-one platform for photographers aiming to display and market their creations effectively.

Product page customization

Google Sites lacks any product page customization features, as the products can be listed with embedding third-party platforms, all the customization can be done within the mentioned platforms. In contrast, Zenfolio allows users to detail their product pages with descriptions, images, and options such as size or color. This allows for each product page to be adjusted to clearly display its unique attributes. Placing products in specific galleries or categories helps organize the site and improve navigation. The platform also supports customization in pricing and shipping settings, allowing sellers to cater to various needs effectively.

Payment processing

You can integrate payment gateways into Google Sites using external tools or links, not through native features. This can be done by embedding HTML code for payment buttons from services like PayPal, Square, or Stripe, or by linking to an external checkout page. Third-party eCommerce widgets also offer a way to add payment functionalities. However, Google Sites doesn’t offer the comprehensive eCommerce capabilities that dedicated platforms provide.

Zenfolio supports Stripe and PayPal for payment processing, integrating them seamlessly into its platform designed for photographers to sell their work online. The platform charges a commerce fee of 7% per order (excluding tax and shipping) and a payment processing fee for transactions through Stripe or PayPal. While Zenfolio offers robust e-commerce functionalities for online sales, including setting up price lists for prints and digital downloads, it does not explicitly mention POS capabilities for in-person sales, suggesting its services are tailored primarily towards online transactions.

Website Editors

Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:

  • Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
  • Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
  • Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
  • Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.0
7.6

🏆

Winner: Zenfolio

. Zenfolio, with a score of 7.6, offers an intuitive, no-coding-required website builder tailored for photographers, featuring drag-and-drop customization, a wide array of templates, and a powerful Custom Layout block for personalized designs. Its integrated eCommerce capabilities enable selling both digital and physical photography products, supported by comprehensive security features for protecting photographers’ work. Additionally, Zenfolio provides tools for SEO, marketing, photo and video hosting, client booking, and management, backed by award-winning customer support.

Zenfolio editor

Google Sites, scoring 7.0, offers a user-friendly website builder editor that allows users to create and design websites without needing coding knowledge. With its drag-and-drop interface, users can easily add, customize, and arrange elements such as text, images, and videos on their web pages. It also provides a variety of templates and design options to help users get started quickly and ensure their site looks professional. Additionally, Google Sites integrates seamlessly with other Google services, enabling the incorporation of Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Maps directly into the website.

Google Sites editor

Mobile editor/app

0
8.5

🏆

Winner: Zenfolio

. Google Sites does not offer a mobile editor app, which can be a significant drawback for users who prefer to manage their websites on the go. On the other hand, Zenfolio provides a mobile editor app that allows users to manage their websites and galleries directly from their mobile devices.

The app includes features for receiving notifications, managing galleries, handling sales-related tasks, and showcasing photos through a client presentation mode. Additionally, the app supports uploading and editing photos, as well as accessing various tools for reports, CRM, bookings, and blog management. However, some features may still necessitate desktop use for full functionality.

In summary, Zenfolio’s mobile app offers a more comprehensive set of features compared to Google Sites, which lacks a mobile editor altogether.

Product testing options

Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:

  • Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
  • Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
  • Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
  • Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
6.9
8.4


Overall Result

:

Zenfolio Wins

. Zenfolio scores 8.4 in product testing options, outperforming Google Sites which scores 6.9. Zenfolio offers a 14-day free trial, during which users can test premium features. Additionally, Zenfolio provides a 30-day money-back guarantee, giving users a longer period to evaluate the platform. Google Sites, on the other hand, offers a free version and a 14-day free trial, but does not provide a money-back guarantee.

Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

Free Plan
Yes No

Trial Duration
14 days 14 days

Testing Premium Features
Limited within trial period
Available during free trial

Money-Back Guarantee
No
Yes (30 days)

Price

PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:

  • Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
  • Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
  • Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
  • Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.1
8.2


Google Sites and Zenfolio have similar price scores, but their pricing structures are quite different.

Google Sites’ pricing is per user and offers a discount for annual billing, while Zenfolio offers fixed-price plans with significant discounts for annual billing. Google Sites also offers enterprise plans for large organizations, while Zenfolio does not.

Google Sites Logo


Offerings

Zenfolio Logo


Offerings


$0-$10

Business Starter ($7.20/month):

This plan includes basic features suitable for individuals or small businesses, offering professional email through Gmail, 30GB of storage per user, and video meetings for up to 100 participants. It allows to manage 1 website and there is no limitation on number of pages.

Value for price:


6.0


Portfolio ($9.00/month):

Basic entry-level with 15 GB photo storage, HD video, single-page website.

Value for price:


6.0


$10-$20

Business Standard ($14.40/month):

Suitable for growing businesses, this plan provides 2 TB of storage per user, video meeting capacity for up to 150 participants with recording features, and access to smart booking pages and shared drives. It allows to manage 1 website and there is no limitation on number of pages.

Value for price:


7.5

No offering at this amount.

$20-$30

Business Plus ($21.60/month):

Designed for larger businesses needing more robust capabilities, offering 5 TB of storage per user, advanced security options, and video meetings for up to 500 participants. It allows to manage 1 website and there is no limitation on number of pages.

Value for price:


8.5


PortfolioPlus ($23.00/month):

Balanced features with 150 GB photo storage, HD video, single-page website.

Value for price:


7.5


$40+
No offering at this amount.

ProSuite ($40.00/month):

Extensive features for photo and video, multi-page websites, blog, templates, and more.

Value for Price:


9.0

In some cases companies have different prices based on various components like a
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.

Hosting quality

Hosting
quality
Examines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:

  • Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
  • Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
  • Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
  • Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
8.2
5.7


Winner: Google Sites

. Google Sites offers cloud-based managed hosting with a 99.9% uptime guarantee and operates 21 data centers globally. Zenfolio also offers cloud hosting but does not disclose any information about its uptime statistics or the locations of its data centers. This lack of transparency gives Google Sites the edge in this category.

Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

Do they offer hosting?

Yes, basic storage with 100MB free per site, can be increased by upgrading to Google Workspace

Yes, from 15GB to unlimited storage, with possibility to backup website’s content manually

Data Centers:

Google operates a total of 21 data centers across the globe: 2 in Asia, 5 in Europe, 13 in US and 1 in South America

Zenfolio does not disclose the locations of its data centers

Type of hosting:

Cloud based managed hosting

Cloud Hosting

Uptime:

99.9%

Zenfolio does not disclose any information about its uptime statistics

Uptime Guarantee:

Yes, 99.9%

Zenfolio does not have an uptime guarantee

Website Speed Optimization

Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:

  • PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
  • Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
  • Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
  • Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
  • CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
3.3
5.2


🏆 Winner: Zenfolio

Both Google Sites and Zenfolio have strategies in place for website speed optimization. However, Zenfolio has a higher website speed optimization score, making it the winner in this comparison.

Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

Focus

Automated Optimization, CDN, Mobile Optimization, Browser Caching, Code Minification, Use of AMP

Mobile responsive design

Performance Tools

Google Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights

Not specified

Key Strategies

Automated Optimization, CDN, Mobile Optimization, Browser Caching, Code Minification, Use of AMP

Mobile responsive design

Load Times

Google does not disclose statistics about website Page Speed scores, or load times

Load times and PageSpeed scores vary depending on optimization and website complexity

Page Speed Scores Range

Not disclosed by Google

Varies depending on optimization and website complexity

Core Web Vitals Improvement

Emphasis on LCP, FID, CLS improvements

Zenfolio does not provide any information on their Core Web Vitals improvements

Google Sites uses a variety of strategies for speed optimization, including automated optimization, CDN, mobile optimization, browser caching, code minification, and the use of AMP. However, Google does not disclose statistics about website Page Speed scores or load times. They do place an emphasis on improving Core Web Vitals, specifically LCP, FID, and CLS.

Zenfolio, on the other hand, focuses on mobile responsive design for speed optimization. The load times and PageSpeed scores can vary depending on the optimization and complexity of the website. Zenfolio does not provide any information on their Core Web Vitals improvements. Despite this, Zenfolio has a higher website speed optimization score compared to Google Sites.

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Plugins and integrations

Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:

  • Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
  • Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
  • Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
  • Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
6.4
6.5


🏆 Winner: Zenfolio.

Zenfolio edges out Google Sites with a score of 6.5, offering a focused set of plugins and integrations specifically designed for photographers. Google Sites, scoring 6.4, offers a wide array of plugins and extensions to enhance website functionality, but Zenfolio’s specialized offerings for photographers give it a slight advantage.

Google Sites Applications

Common Ninja Google Sites plugins

Marketing Features

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
2.6
6.1

🏆

Overall Winner: Zenfolio

. Zenfolio stands out for its more comprehensive marketing tools, especially in email marketing, blogging, and ads and promotions. Google Sites, while offering basic SEO and analytics, lacks in email marketing, blogging, and ads and promotions.

Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

SEO Tools
Basic SEO settings Limited SEO tools

Email Marketing
No Yes

Blogging
No Yes, on higher plans

Social Media Integration
Yes, basic social media links and widgets Yes, sharing via Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pinterest

Analytics and Reporting
Google Analytics integration Basic built-in analytics, Google Analytics integration

Ads and Promotions
No Yes, custom discount coupons and automated marketing

Customer Support

Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:

  • Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
  • Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
  • Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
  • Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
7.2
6.7


🏆 Winner: Google Sites

. In the comparison of Google Sites vs Zenfolio, Google Sites takes the lead with a customer support score of 7.2. Google Sites offers a robust support system primarily through self-service resources like a Help Center and community forums. For Google Workspace customers, direct support options such as phone, email, and live chat are available, with 24/7 support for critical issues depending on the subscription tier. This makes Google Sites a reliable choice for users seeking comprehensive support.

Zenfolio, with a customer support score of 6.7, provides support through email 365 days a year, LiveChat from Monday to Thursday, and phone support for Advanced plan subscribers during specific hours. While Zenfolio’s Support Center is rich with self-help resources, its limited live support hours and restricted phone support availability may not meet the needs of all users, particularly those requiring immediate assistance outside of the specified hours.

Security

SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:

  • Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
  • SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
  • Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
  • Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
9.3
8.0

🏆

Winner: Google Sites

. Google Sites, with a security score of 9.3, offers robust security measures including SSL encryption, two-factor authentication, and automatic malware scanning. It also benefits from Google’s regular security updates and compliance with international data protection standards. Google Sites’ infrastructure provides DDoS protection and data redundancy, ensuring a secure environment for website creators and visitors.

Zenfolio, scoring 8.0 in security, also emphasizes security with SSL encryption for all its websites, watermarking, password-protected galleries, and cloud backup. However, it falls slightly short compared to Google Sites in terms of overall security measures.

AI Capabilities

AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:

  • Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
  • Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
  • AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
  • Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0
2.4
Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

AI Builder







AI Ecommerce features




PhotoRefine.ai for efficient photo management

AI content generation







Additional AI features







🏆 Winner: Zenfolio

. Zenfolio, with a score of 2.4, offers AI-driven eCommerce features aimed at enhancing the online selling experience for photographers. Its AI tool, PhotoRefine.ai, streamlines the process of sorting, grouping, and selecting photos. This tool utilizes artificial intelligence to assist photographers in quickly and efficiently managing their photo collections, making it easier to prepare and sell their work online.

Google Sites, with a score of 0, does not have any AI features. It does not offer any AI-driven eCommerce features, AI content generation features, or any additional AI features.

User Management

User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:

  • Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
    permissions.
  • Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
  • Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
    levels.
  • Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.8
2.8


🏆 Winner: Google Sites

. Google Sites and Zenfolio have different approaches to user management.

  • Google Sites allows multiple users to collaborate with different roles, including Owners, who have full control, and Editors, who can modify content but not site settings. There’s no strict limit on the number of users who can edit a site, allowing flexibility in management and development. Viewers can only see the site, with no editing permissions. This structure supports collaborative website building with varied levels of access and control for different users.
  • Zenfolio, on the other hand, allows only one user to edit and manage a website. This might limit the flexibility and collaborative possibilities, especially for larger projects or teams.

Unfortunately, there are no detailed user roles and access levels tables available for both platforms.

Additional Features

Google Sites Logo
Zenfolio Logo

SSL Certificate







Custom Domain







Free Custom Domain Included







International Domains







Mobile Responsive







Page Speed







Website Builder Mobile App







Convert a Website To An App







Website Analytics







Multilingual Sites







Multiple Users


User Feedback

Google Sites
42,340 reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
Zenfolio
3 reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars

Users consistently praise Google Workspace, particularly Google Sites, for its seamless integration, ease of use, and collaborative features, making it a go-to solution for various professional and educational needs. The platform’s simplicity and user-friendly interface are lauded, enabling effortless website creation and sharing of information within organizations. While some users desire more customization options and additional features, overall, Google Workspace remains highly valued for its versatility and streamlined workflow facilitation.

Users appreciate Zenfolio for its elegant and affordable site/portfolio designs, highlighting the platform’s suitability for photographers looking to showcase and sell their work online. The Starter plan is praised for its value, though some users express a desire to upgrade to the Pro plan for its enhanced client interaction features and customizable marketing tools. Criticisms include dissatisfaction with the platform’s handling of photo albums and a desire for more privacy and faster loading times. Overall, Zenfolio is valued for its ability to organize and share professional photographs and files, despite some navigational and performance issues.

The making of this blog

We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.

FAQ

Which platform is better for photographers, Google Sites or Zenfolio?

Zenfolio is the clear choice for photographers and visual artists. It offers specialized templates, integrated ecommerce capabilities for selling prints and digital downloads, and tools for marketing and client proofing. Google Sites, while versatile, lacks the specific features and customization options that photographers require.

Can I sell products on both Google Sites and Zenfolio?

Yes, but Zenfolio provides a more comprehensive solution with integrated ecommerce capabilities designed specifically for selling photography and art online. Google Sites can integrate third-party ecommerce tools, but it doesn’t offer built-in ecommerce features, making Zenfolio the superior option for online sales.

Which platform offers better templates for creating a website?

Zenfolio offers better templates for photographers and visual artists, focusing on high-quality, customizable, and mobile-friendly designs. Google Sites provides a range of templates for various purposes, but they are more basic and less focused on visual arts.

Is Google Sites or Zenfolio easier to use for beginners?

Google Sites is generally easier for beginners due to its simple, drag-and-drop interface and integration with other Google services. Zenfolio, while also user-friendly, targets a more specific audience and may require a slight learning curve to make the most of its photography-focused features.

Which platform is more affordable, Google Sites or Zenfolio?

Both platforms offer competitive pricing, but Google Sites might be more affordable for basic use since it includes a free version. Zenfolio’s plans are priced based on the features and storage needed, making it potentially more costly but also providing more value for photographers with its specialized tools.

Can I use Google Sites and Zenfolio for a team project?

Google Sites is designed for collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on a site simultaneously, making it ideal for team projects. Zenfolio is more focused on individual photographers and doesn’t offer the same level of collaborative features as Google Sites.

Which platform offers better customer support?

Google Sites provides a comprehensive support system with various channels, including a Help Center, community forums, and direct support options for Google Workspace customers. Zenfolio also offers solid customer support, including email, live chat, and phone support for advanced plan subscribers, but Google Sites has a slight edge in this category due to its broader support options.

How do Google Sites and Zenfolio compare in terms of website speed and optimization?

Zenfolio has a higher score in website speed optimization, focusing on mobile responsive design. Google Sites uses automated optimization strategies, but Zenfolio is specifically tailored to ensure fast loading times and a smooth browsing experience for photography websites.

Build your website in 1 minute

Share article

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your email address will never be published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Comment*

Name *