Siter.io vs Carbonmade: Comprehensive comparison guide for 2024

Final verdict


Siter.io vs Carbonmade: Both platforms cater to different user needs, with Siter.io offering a more versatile web design experience and Carbonmade focusing on portfolio creation for creatives.


  • Siter.io (Overall Grade: 5.1/10)

    is designed to simplify website creation with its drag-and-drop interface and unique freehand design tool. It offers a range of templates and design elements, making it suitable for various purposes, including business, personal, and e-commerce. Siter.io’s integration with Figma and basic ecommerce functionalities make it a versatile choice for users who need design flexibility and some level of online store capabilities. However, its limited integration options and lack of transparency in hosting details are areas for improvement.

  • Carbonmade (Overall Grade: 4.4/10)

    excels in providing a straightforward portfolio creation process tailored for creatives. It offers fully customizable layouts and pre-designed templates, making it ideal for photographers, illustrators, and other professionals who want to showcase their work online without coding skills. While Carbonmade lacks ecommerce features and has limited user management capabilities, its focus on simplicity and ease of use makes it a strong choice for users who prioritize portfolio presentation over other functionalities.

Best for ecommerce

3.4
0


Verdict

: Siter.io offers basic ecommerce functionalities, making it a better choice for small online stores compared to Carbonmade, which lacks any ecommerce features.


  • Siter.io

    : While primarily a design-focused platform, Siter.io includes essential ecommerce features such as a shopping cart, checkout, and purchase button. Its integration with Figma allows for the use of third-party templates, providing flexibility in design. However, its payment processing capabilities are limited, requiring custom code for third-party payment widgets. Siter.io scores 3.4 for ecommerce, reflecting its basic but functional ecommerce tools.

  • Carbonmade

    : Designed for creatives to showcase their work, Carbonmade does not offer any ecommerce functionalities. This makes it unsuitable for users looking to build an online store. With a score of 0 for ecommerce, Carbonmade is best suited for portfolio creation rather than ecommerce.

Best for informational & business websites

7.2
5.9


Verdict

: Siter.io is the better choice for creating informational and business websites, offering a more versatile and feature-rich platform compared to Carbonmade.


  • Siter.io

    : Siter.io scores 7.2 for informational and business websites, making it a strong contender in this category. It provides a drag-and-drop interface and a unique freehand design tool, which simplifies the website creation process for users without coding knowledge. Siter.io also offers a range of templates and design elements, along with features like a built-in Figma plugin, SEO tools, and responsive design for mobile devices. These functionalities make it a comprehensive solution for various website needs, including business and personal sites.

  • Carbonmade

    : Carbonmade, with a score of 5.9, is tailored specifically for creatives who want to showcase their work online. While it excels in providing customizable layouts and an easy portfolio creation process, it lacks the versatility needed for broader informational and business website purposes. Carbonmade’s focus on simplicity and ease of use makes it ideal for photographers, illustrators, and other creatives, but it may not offer the same level of functionality and customization as Siter.io for business-oriented websites.

Detailed comparison

Design functionalities & templates

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
7.5
7.3

🏆

Winner: Siter.io.

If you’re looking for a platform that offers more traditional templates and a unique freehand design tool, Siter.io is the preferred choice.

Siter.io includes a handful of customizable templates for various website types, such as landing pages, portfolios, and e-commerce sites, ensuring users can start with a solid foundation and tailor each site to their needs. The platform’s integration with Figma allows for seamless importation of designs, providing a high degree of creative freedom.

Siter.io templates
Siter.io template example

Compared to Siter.io, Carbonmade does not have traditional templates. Instead, the platform creates a personalized portfolio website based on the inputs of the users. This approach is tailored for creatives who want to showcase their work online without the need for coding skills, offering fully customizable layouts and a range of features to enhance portfolio presentation.

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Ease of use

Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:

  • Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
  • Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
  • User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
  • Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.3
8.3


🏆 Tie: Siter.io and Carbonmade

. Both Siter.io and Carbonmade score an impressive 8.3 in ease of use, making them equally accessible for users without coding skills. Siter.io’s drag-and-drop interface and unique freehand design tool, along with its Figma integration, make it a versatile choice for various purposes. Carbonmade, on the other hand, excels in providing a straightforward portfolio creation process with customizable layouts, making it ideal for creatives.


Learning Resources


🏆 Tie: Siter.io and Carbonmade

. Both platforms offer comprehensive learning resources to help users get started. Siter.io provides tutorials and guides focused on responsive design and Figma integration, while Carbonmade offers video tutorials and a help center tailored to portfolio creation.

For ecommerce

EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:

  • Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
  • Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
  • Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
  • Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
  • Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
3.4
0

Siter.io and Carbonmade cater to different needs when it comes to ecommerce. Siter.io, while primarily a design-focused platform, offers basic ecommerce functionalities. Carbonmade, on the other hand, does not provide any ecommerce features, making it unsuitable for online stores.

Siter.io Logo

Ecommerce themes and templates

4.5

0.0

Product page customization

6.5

0.0

Payment processing and commissions

3.0

0.0

POS capabilities

2.0

0.0

Payment gateways

3.5

0.0

Product numbers

2.5

0.0

Additional ecommerce features

3.0

0.0

Siter.io ecommerce features:

  • Shopping cart
  • Checkout
  • Purchase button

Carbonmade ecommerce features:

  • There are no ecommerce features provided by Carbonmade

Ecommerce themes & templates

Siter.io has only a few ecommerce-specific templates. However, its built-in Figma integration enables the use of a variety of third-party website templates designed in Figma to create a fully functional website directly on the platform. Carbonmade does not offer any templates for ecommerce.

Product page customization

Siter.io prioritizes its design capabilities, offering a wide range of customization options that are only limited by the user’s skill level. Carbonmade does not have ecommerce capabilities, thus it’s not possible to have product pages.

Payment processing

Siter.io primarily serves as a website design tool rather than a dedicated ecommerce platform. While it does allow for the creation of ecommerce websites, its functionality for integrating payment gateways is quite limited. However, the platform supports custom code injection, enabling users to integrate third-party payment widgets like PayPal or Stripe. Carbonmade does not have payment processing capabilities.

In summary, Siter.io offers some basic ecommerce features, making it a viable option for small online stores or those who prioritize design flexibility. Carbonmade, lacking any ecommerce functionality, is not suitable for ecommerce purposes.

Website Editors

Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:

  • Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
  • Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
  • Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
  • Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.8
7.6

🏆

Winner: Siter.io

. Siter.io, with a score of 7.8, is designed to simplify the process of creating and managing websites. It offers a drag-and-drop interface and a unique freehand design tool, making it easy for users without coding knowledge to design and customize their sites. The editor features an intuitive interface, real-time collaboration, and Figma integration, enhancing productivity and creativity for designers and teams. It supports inserting custom code for additional functionality and integrates with Unsplash for high-quality, royalty-free photos.

Siter.io editor

Carbonmade’s editor, scoring 7.6, is tailored for creatives to build personalized, professional online portfolios without requiring coding knowledge. It provides responsive design across devices, 4K video support, unlimited image and video uploads, and premade blocks for customization. The platform includes unique features such as private portfolios, a before/after block, gallery slideshows, and a talent pool to connect with other creatives and potential clients. While it offers extensive customization options, its focus on portfolio websites may limit its functionality for broader website needs.

Mobile editor/app

0
0

🏆

Winner: None

. Both Siter.io and Carbonmade do not offer dedicated mobile editor apps. This means that users of these platforms will need to rely on desktop versions for editing and managing their websites. While both platforms excel in their respective areas—Siter.io with its design-focused tools and Figma integration, and Carbonmade with its portfolio-centric features—they lack the convenience of mobile editing capabilities.

In summary, neither Siter.io nor Carbonmade provide a mobile editor app, making it necessary for users to perform website edits and management tasks on a desktop or laptop.

Product testing options

Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:

  • Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
  • Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
  • Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
  • Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
8.2
7.2


Overall Result

:

Siter.io wins

. Siter.io scores 8.2, offering a free version that allows users to test all premium features, making it highly accessible for thorough evaluation. Carbonmade scores 7.2, providing a trial version to test all features but lacks a free version, which may limit long-term testing flexibility.

Siter.io Logo

Free Plan

Yes
No

Trial Duration
No
Yes

Testing Premium Features

All features with free plan
All features within the trial period

Price

PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:

  • Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
  • Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
  • Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
  • Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.1
7.9


Siter.io offers a range of plans starting from a free tier, while Carbonmade provides more specialized plans for creatives, with both platforms offering discounts for annual billing.

Siter.io Logo


Offerings


Offerings


Free

Start (Free/month):

Includes unlimited teammates, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites are free, and SEO and page speed features are not included. Additionally, it’s not possible to publish any of the websites with the free plan.

No offering at this amount.

$0-$10

Solo ($8/month):

For 1 website and includes 2 editors, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $4 each.

Value for Price:


6.0


BEGINNER ($9/month):

8 Projects, Unlimited images/videos, Basic Blocks, Limited Support, 3 Navigations, SD Video, Audio Uploads

Value for Price:


5.0


$10-$20

Plus ($14/month):

Offers 3 websites with 4 editors, up to 50 pages, 5 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $6 each.

Value for Price:


7.5


PRO ($12/month):

50 Projects, More Portfolio Grids, Premium Blocks, Unbranded, Portfolio statistics, Custom Pages, Private Portfolio, Unlimited images/videos, 5 Navigations, HD Video & Audio, Priority Support

Value for Price:


7.0


$20+

Pro ($29/month):

Provides 5 websites, 6 editors, unlimited pages, unlimited forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites cost $8 each.

Value for Price:


8.5


UNLIMITED ($22/month):

UNLIMITED projects/pages, Everything else, All features in PRO, Extra Karma

Value for Price:


8.5

In some cases companies have different prices based on various components like a
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.

Hosting quality

Hosting
quality
Examines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:

  • Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
  • Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
  • Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
  • Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
3.9
6.1

🏆

Winner: Carbonmade

Carbonmade offers managed hosting with unlimited storage, making it a more reliable choice for creatives needing ample space for their portfolios. Siter.io, while providing cloud-based hosting, lacks transparency on bandwidth, storage limitations, and uptime statistics, which can be a concern for users. Carbonmade’s higher rating reflects its more robust hosting features.

Siter.io Logo

Do they offer hosting?

Yes

Yes, with unlimited storage

Data Centers:

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Type of hosting:

Cloud-based hosting

Managed Hosting

Uptime:

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Uptime Guarantee:

No

No

Website Speed Optimization

Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:

  • PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
  • Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
  • Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
  • Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
  • CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
1.5
5.0


🏆 Winner: Carbonmade

While both Siter.io and Carbonmade offer tools for creating and managing websites, Carbonmade has a slight edge in terms of website speed optimization.

Siter.io Logo

Focus

Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization

Not specified

Performance Tools

Not specified

Not specified

Key Strategies

Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization

Not specified

Load Times

Not disclosed

Varies depending on optimization

Page Speed Scores Range

Not disclosed

Varies depending on optimization

Core Web Vitals Improvement

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Siter.io is designed to simplify the process of creating and managing websites with a drag-and-drop interface and freehand design tool. It offers a range of templates and design elements, making it easy for users without coding knowledge to design and customize their sites. Siter.io includes features such as a built-in Figma plugin, SEO tools, and responsive design for mobile devices. However, Siter.io does not disclose specific statistics about PageSpeed scores, load times, or Core Web Vitals improvements.

Carbonmade, on the other hand, is tailored for creatives who want to showcase their work online without the need for coding skills. It offers fully customizable layouts and pre-designed templates, making it accessible to users regardless of their technical background. While Carbonmade does not provide detailed information on its speed optimization features, load times, or Core Web Vitals improvements, it generally performs better in terms of website speed optimization compared to Siter.io.

In summary, Carbonmade has a slight advantage over Siter.io in terms of website speed optimization, although both platforms have room for improvement in this area.

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Plugins and integrations

Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:

  • Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
  • Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
  • Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
  • Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
5.5
0


🏆 Winner: Siter.io.

Siter.io scores 5.5, offering limited but valuable integrations, including a unique Figma plugin, Google Analytics, and Meta Pixel. These integrations enhance its design and analytics capabilities, making it a more versatile choice for users who need some level of extended functionality. Carbonmade, with a score of 0, does not support any plugins or integrations, focusing solely on simplicity and ease of use for portfolio creation.

While Siter.io’s integration options are limited, they provide essential tools for users looking to enhance their website’s design and analytics capabilities.

Marketing Features

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
2.6
1.0

🏆

Overall Winner: Siter.io

. Siter.io offers a more comprehensive set of marketing tools, including basic SEO features, blogging capabilities, and integration with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Carbonmade, while user-friendly for creatives, lacks many essential marketing features.

Siter.io Logo

SEO Tools

Yes, basic SEO features

No

Email Marketing

No

No

Blogging

Yes, possible to design a simple blog

No

Social Media Integration

No

Yes, possibility to add social network links

Analytics and Reporting

Yes, Google Analytics integration

Yes, custom analytics and insights

Ads and Promotions

Yes, Facebook Pixel integration

No

Customer Support

Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:

  • Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
  • Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
  • Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
  • Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
4.1
5.8


🏆 Winner: Carbonmade

. In the comparison of Siter.io vs Carbonmade, Carbonmade takes the lead in customer support. Carbonmade offers a ticket-based support system where users can submit inquiries via email and typically receive responses within a few hours. Although it lacks live support, the quick response times are a significant advantage for users needing timely assistance.

On the other hand, Siter.io provides support through an extensive help center and articles, with email support available. However, the platform does not specify the availability hours for customer support, which can be a drawback for users requiring immediate help. While both platforms have room for improvement, Carbonmade’s faster response times give it an edge in this category.

Security

SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:

  • Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
  • SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
  • Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
  • Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
6.8
5.8

🏆

Winner: Siter.io

. Siter.io takes a more comprehensive approach to security with its zero-knowledge storage system, ensuring that user data is encrypted both in storage and during transfer. The platform also employs multi-factor authentication and conducts regular security audits, providing a robust security framework for its users.

Carbonmade, while prioritizing the security of user information through physical, electronic, and managerial safeguards, does not disclose specific security measures for website protection. This lack of transparency and detailed security features places it behind Siter.io in terms of overall security.


Security Scores:

  • Siter.io: 6.8
  • Carbonmade: 5.8

AI Capabilities

AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:

  • Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
  • Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
  • AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
  • Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0.0
0
Siter.io Logo

AI Builder


None



None


AI Ecommerce Features


None



None


AI Content Generation


None



None


Additional AI Features


None



None


🏆 Winner: None

. Both Siter.io and Carbonmade do not offer any AI capabilities. This means that users looking for AI-driven features such as automated design suggestions, content generation, or ecommerce optimizations will need to consider other platforms.

User Management

User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:

  • Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
    permissions.
  • Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
  • Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
    levels.
  • Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.1
2.8


🏆 Winner: Siter.io

. When it comes to managing users and collaboration, Siter.io offers more flexibility compared to Carbonmade.

  • Siter.io focuses on its real-time collaborative features, offering varying numbers of editors depending on the plan. Each plan provides access for 2 to 6 editors who can edit and design websites, with the option to include additional editors for an extra fee.
  • Carbonmade allows only one user to manage and edit a website, which can be limiting for teams or collaborative projects.

Both platforms support simultaneous editing, but Siter.io’s approach is more suited for collaborative environments.

Siter.io User Management Score:

7.1

Carbonmade User Management Score:

2.8

Additional Features

Siter.io Logo

SSL Certificate






X


Custom Domain









Free Custom Domain Included






X


International Domains









Mobile Responsive









Page Speed









Website Builder Mobile App


X



X


Convert a Website To An App


X



X


Website Analytics









Multilingual Sites









Multiple Users



X

User Feedback

Siter.io
4 reviews
4.8 out of 5 stars
Carbonmade
27 reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars

Overall, users appreciate Siter.io for its user-friendly interface and robust features, such as the drag-and-drop editor and customizable templates, making website building accessible to teams without coding expertise. However, there’s a consensus that the platform could improve its integration options to enhance workflow efficiency further. Nevertheless, Siter.io effectively addresses the challenge of website creation without coding skills, benefiting designers, small business owners, and individuals seeking to establish an online presence or portfolio quickly and efficiently.

Users appreciate Carbonmade for its ease of use, modern design templates, and no-code platform, which simplifies creating professional portfolios. However, some express a desire for a freemium plan and note limitations in customization and mobile site loading times. The platform is highly recommended for creatives, particularly illustrators and graphic designers, for its variety of design options and efficient customer service. Despite concerns over pricing, the overall sentiment is positive, with users finding value in Carbonmade’s ability to showcase their work effectively and streamline portfolio management.

The making of this blog

We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.

FAQ

Which platform is better for creatives looking to showcase their work, Siter.io or Carbonmade?

Carbonmade is specifically designed for creatives such as photographers, illustrators, and graphic designers, focusing on portfolio presentation with customizable layouts and ease of use. Siter.io, while versatile, is more general-purpose and may not cater as specifically to the needs of creatives.

Can I use Siter.io or Carbonmade for ecommerce?

Siter.io offers basic ecommerce functionalities, making it suitable for small online stores that also prioritize design flexibility. Carbonmade, however, does not support ecommerce features, making it unsuitable for users looking to build an online store.

How do Siter.io and Carbonmade compare in terms of ease of use?

Both platforms score equally in ease of use, each offering user-friendly interfaces that require no coding skills. Siter.io provides a drag-and-drop interface and a unique freehand design tool, while Carbonmade offers a streamlined portfolio creation process.

What are the main differences in pricing between Siter.io and Carbonmade?

Siter.io offers a free plan and several paid options that scale with additional features and capabilities, making it accessible for different user needs. Carbonmade does not have a free plan but provides specialized plans tailored for creatives, with features that support professional portfolio management.

Which platform offers better customer support, Siter.io or Carbonmade?

Carbonmade provides quicker response times through its ticket-based support system, although it lacks live support options. Siter.io offers extensive help articles and email support but does not specify support hours, which may affect users needing immediate assistance.

Build your website in 1 minute

Share article

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your email address will never be published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Comment*

Name *