Siter.io vs Carrd: Comprehensive comparison guide for 2024

Final verdict


Siter.io and Carrd both offer unique features tailored to different user needs, but they cater to slightly different audiences.


  • Siter.io (Overall Grade: 5.1/10)

    is designed for users who appreciate a robust design tool with a drag-and-drop interface and Figma integration. It’s ideal for those who want to create professional-looking websites without coding knowledge. Siter.io offers a range of templates and design elements, making it suitable for various purposes, including business, personal, and e-commerce. However, its limited integration options and slightly steeper learning curve may be a drawback for some users.

  • Carrd (Overall Grade: 6.1/10)

    excels in simplicity and affordability, making it perfect for individuals and small businesses looking to create single-page websites quickly and efficiently. Carrd offers a variety of templates and customization options, ensuring that users can create attractive and functional websites without extensive web development skills. Its user-friendly interface and straightforward pricing plans make it an attractive option for those who prioritize ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

Best for ecommerce

3.4
3.5


Verdict

: Siter.io and Carrd both offer basic ecommerce functionalities, but neither is primarily designed for ecommerce. Carrd slightly edges out Siter.io with better payment processing and integration options.


  • Siter.io

    : Siter.io provides essential ecommerce features like a shopping cart, checkout, and purchase button. Its strength lies in its design capabilities, thanks to the built-in Figma integration, which allows for extensive customization. However, its ecommerce functionalities are limited, making it more suitable for users who prioritize design over robust ecommerce features.

  • Carrd

    : Carrd offers a more streamlined approach to ecommerce with integrations for Paypal and Stripe, external widgets, and basic product listing options. It provides a selection of ecommerce templates aimed at quick setup and conversion optimization. Carrd’s ease of use and better payment processing options make it a slightly better choice for small-scale ecommerce needs.

Best for informational & business websites

7.2
7.9


Verdict

: Carrd is the preferred choice for creating simple, single-page informational websites, while Siter.io offers more advanced design capabilities for users looking for a more customizable experience.


  • Siter.io

    : Siter.io is a versatile website builder that simplifies the process of creating and managing websites. Its drag-and-drop interface and unique freehand design tool make it easy for users without coding knowledge to design and customize their sites. With a score of 7.2, Siter.io is well-suited for users who need more design flexibility and integration options, such as the built-in Figma plugin. However, its slightly steeper learning curve compared to Carrd might be a consideration for beginners.

  • Carrd

    : Carrd excels in creating fully responsive, single-page websites with ease. Scoring 7.9, Carrd is designed with simplicity and efficiency in mind, making it ideal for personal profiles, landing pages, and small business websites. Its straightforward interface and affordable pricing plans make it an attractive option for individuals and small businesses looking to establish an online presence quickly and efficiently. When comparing Siter.io vs Carrd, Carrd’s user-friendly approach and focus on simplicity make it the better choice for those prioritizing ease of use.

Detailed comparison

Design functionalities & templates

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
7.5
7.5


Winner: Tie.

Both Siter.io and Carrd offer robust design functionalities and templates, making it easy for users to create and customize their websites.

Siter.io includes a handful of customizable templates for various website types, such as landing pages, portfolios, and e-commerce sites, ensuring users can start with a solid foundation and tailor each site to their needs. However, the limited number of templates is compensated with a UI which is very similar to design tools like Figma and AdobeXD. Additionally Siter.io has built in Figma plugin, which helps to export Figma designs directly to Siter.io platform, and make changes and tweaks right on Siter.io.

Siter.io templates
Siter.io template example

On the other hand, Carrd is a versatile platform that offers a wide variety of templates and designs, catering to different needs and preferences. Users can choose from a broad selection of themes, ranging from simple and minimalist to complex and dynamic layouts, ensuring there’s something for everyone. The platform continuously updates its library with new designs, keeping up with the latest trends in web design.


Carrd Themes

Carrd.co templates
Carrd Website Template

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Ease of use

Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:

  • Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
  • Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
  • User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
  • Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.3
9.0


🏆 Winner: Carrd

. Scoring a solid 9.0, Carrd stands out for its user-friendly interface, making it exceptionally easy for beginners to create and manage their websites. Siter.io, with a score of 8.3, offers a robust platform but with a unique feature of importing designs from Figma which might require some learning. If ease of use is a priority, Carrd is the clear winner in this category.


Learning Resources

Both platforms offer solid learning resources, but neither has large communities across various platforms. Carrd has a small subreddit with around 1400 users, while Siter.io does not have an official community forum.

For ecommerce

EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:

  • Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
  • Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
  • Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
  • Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
  • Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
3.4
3.5

Both Siter.io and Carrd are not primarily designed for ecommerce, but they do offer some basic ecommerce features. Siter.io has a shopping cart, checkout, and purchase button, while Carrd offers Paypal and Stripe integration, external widgets integrations, and basic product listing options.

Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

Ecommerce themes and templates

4.5

4.5

Product page customization

6.5

3.0

Payment processing and commissions

3.0

5.0

POS capabilities

2.0

0.0

Payment gateways

3.5

5.5

Product numbers

2.5

2.0

Additional ecommerce features

3.0

3.5

Siter.io ecommerce features:

  • Shopping cart
  • Checkout
  • Purchase button

Carrd ecommerce features:

  • Paypal and Stripe Integration
  • External Widgets integrations
  • Basic Product Listing options

Ecommerce themes & templates

Siter.io has only a few ecommerce specific templates, but its built-in Figma integration allows for the use of a variety of third-party website templates. On the other hand, Carrd provides a selection of 14 ecommerce templates aimed at users looking to quickly launch online stores for products ranging from e-books to physical goods. These templates are crafted with a focus on simplicity and conversion optimization.

Product page customization

Siter.io prioritizes its design capabilities, offering a wide range of customization options that are only limited by the user’s skill level. Carrd offers a streamlined approach to ecommerce product page customization, primarily through integrations with third-party platforms such as Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, and Gumroad. Users can create product pages within Carrd by adding product details like name, description, image, and price, and then integrate a checkout button using Carrd’s Widget element for platforms like Stripe.

Payment processing

When it comes to payment processing, Siter.io primarily serves as a website design tool rather than a dedicated ecommerce platform. While it does allow for the creation of ecommerce websites, its functionality for integrating payment gateways is quite limited. However, it’s important to note that the platform does support custom code injection, enabling users to integrate third-party payment widgets like PayPal or Stripe. Carrd allows for payment-enabled forms for Pro Plus users or higher, integrating with Stripe Checkout for payment processing. This setup enables creating forms for various transactions like order forms or paid email lists. The process requires setting up the payment through Stripe, either via a preconfigured price or a custom price, and entering Stripe API keys. There’s no direct mention of Carrd charging commissions or offering POS capabilities within this documentation. For payment gateways, it specifically supports Stripe and Paypal.

Website Editors

Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:

  • Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
  • Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
  • Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
  • Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.8
7.0

🏆

Winner: Siter.io

. Siter.io, with a score of 7.8, offers an editor designed to empower users with the ability to create websites seamlessly without any coding skills. It features an intuitive interface, real-time collaboration, and Figma integration, enhancing productivity and creativity for designers and teams. The editor supports inserting custom code for additional functionality, accessing thousands of free icons, and integrating with Unsplash for high-quality, royalty-free photos.

Siter.io editor

Carrd’s website builder editor, scoring 7.0, is designed for simplicity and efficiency, catering primarily to users looking to create single-page websites. It offers a user-friendly interface that allows for easy drag-and-drop functionality, enabling users to add, customize, and position elements such as text, images, buttons, and forms with minimal effort. The editor also provides a range of pre-designed templates and responsive design options, ensuring that websites look professional and work seamlessly across various devices.

Carrd editor

Mobile editor/app

0
5.5

🏆

Winner: Carrd

. Neither Siter.io nor Carrd offer a dedicated mobile editor app. However, Carrd allows users to edit their websites on a mobile browser, which gives it an advantage over Siter.io. This feature can be particularly useful for users who need to make quick changes on the go.

Therefore, Carrd is the winner in this category due to its mobile browser editing capabilities.

Product testing options

Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:

  • Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
  • Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
  • Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
  • Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
8.2
6.0


Overall Result

:

Siter.io wins

with a score of 8.2 against Carrd’s 6.0. Siter.io offers a free version that allows users to test all premium features, while Carrd only allows testing of premium features during a 7-day free trial. Neither platform offers a money-back guarantee.

Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

Free Plan

Yes
No

Trial Duration
No 7 days

Testing Premium Features

All features with free plan
During free trial

Money Back Guarantee
No No

Price

PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:

  • Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
  • Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
  • Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
  • Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.1
8.9


Carrd offers more affordable pricing plans compared to Siter.io, making it a more budget-friendly option for users who need to create simple, single-page websites.

Siter.io Logo


Offerings

Carrd Logo


Offerings


Free

Start (Free/month):

Includes unlimited teammates, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites are free, and SEO and page speed features are not included. Additionally, it’s not possible to publish any of the websites with the free plan.

No offering at this amount.

$0-$1
No offering at this amount.

Pro Lite ($0.75/month):

Basic features suitable for simple, personal websites. Up to 3 1-page websites.

Value for price:


6.0


$1-$3
No offering at this amount.

Pro Standard ($1.58/month):

Offers more features and flexibility, ideal for professional profiles and small projects. Up to 10 1-page websites.

Value for price:


7.5


$3-$10

Solo ($8/month):

For 1 website and includes 2 editors, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $4 each.

Value for price:


6.0


Pro Plus ($4.08/month):

Enhanced features for more complex sites, including additional customization options. Up to 25 1-page websites.

Value for price:


8.5


$10-$20

Plus ($14/month):

Offers 3 websites with 4 editors, up to 50 pages, 5 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $6 each.

Value for price:


7.5

No offering at this amount.

$20+

Pro ($29/month):

Provides 5 websites, 6 editors, unlimited pages, unlimited forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites cost $8 each.

Value for price:


8.5

No offering at this amount.
In some cases companies have different prices based on various components like a
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.

Hosting quality

Hosting
quality
Examines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:

  • Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
  • Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
  • Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
  • Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
3.9
5.0

🏆

Winner: Carrd

Both Siter.io and Carrd offer hosting services, but neither provides detailed information about their hosting features such as bandwidth, storage limitations, or data center locations. They also do not disclose uptime statistics or offer an uptime guarantee. However, Carrd’s hosting quality score is slightly higher than Siter.io’s, making it the winner in this category.

Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

Do they offer hosting?

Yes

Yes

Type of hosting:

Cloud based hosting

Shared Hosting

Uptime:

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Uptime Guarantee:

No

No

Data Centers:

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Website Speed Optimization

Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:

  • PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
  • Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
  • Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
  • Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
  • CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
1.5
8.2


🏆 Winner: Carrd

Both Siter.io and Carrd prioritize website performance and speed, but Carrd has a higher website speed optimization score and uses more effective strategies for speed optimization.

Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

Focus

Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization

Mobile Responsive design, Caching, Cloudflare CDN

Performance Tools

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Key Strategies

Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization

Mobile Responsive design, Caching, Cloudflare CDN

Load Times

Not disclosed

Minimal due to simplicity of websites

Page Speed Scores Range

Not disclosed

Expected to be high due to simplicity of websites

Core Web Vitals Improvement

Not disclosed

Not disclosed

Carrd, with its focus on simplicity and ease of use, has a higher website speed optimization score. It uses strategies such as mobile responsive design, caching, and Cloudflare CDN for speed optimization. Given that websites built with Carrd are fairly simple, load times are expected to be minimal, and page speed scores are expected to be high. However, Carrd does not disclose any information related to Core Web Vitals improvements.

On the other hand, Siter.io, despite its unique freehand design tool and drag-and-drop interface, has a lower website speed optimization score. It uses strategies such as mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization for speed optimization. However, Siter.io does not disclose any statistics about PageSpeed scores, load times, or Core Web Vitals improvements.

Get a head start on website creation with AI

Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!

No credit card required

Plugins and integrations

Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:

  • Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
  • Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
  • Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
  • Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
5.5
5.8


🏆 Winner: Carrd.

Carrd, with a score of 5.8, slightly edges out Siter.io, which scores 5.5. Carrd offers a range of plugins and extensions, both free and paid, that enhance the functionality of the platform beyond its base features. These include advanced user interactions, sophisticated content presentation, and media enhancements. Siter.io, on the other hand, offers limited integrations, primarily focusing on its design capabilities. However, it does support custom code injection, allowing users to incorporate third-party plugins as needed.

Marketing Features

Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:

  • Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
  • Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
  • User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
  • Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
  • Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
2.6
5.8

🏆

Overall Winner: Carrd

. Carrd offers a wider range of marketing features, including SEO tools, email marketing through third-party integrations, blogging, social media integration, analytics and reporting, and ads and promotions. Siter.io, on the other hand, lacks in email marketing and social media integration.

Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

SEO Tools







Email Marketing




✓ (through third-party integrations)

Blogging

✓ (possible to design a simple blog)




Social Media Integration







Analytics and Reporting

✓ (Google analytics integration)

✓ (Google analytics integration)

Ads and Promotions

✓ (Facebook Pixel integration)

✓ (through third-party integrations)

Customer Support

Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:

  • Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
  • Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
  • Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
  • Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
4.1
6.2


🏆 Winner: Carrd

. When comparing Siter.io vs Carrd, Carrd takes the lead in customer support with a score of 6.2. Carrd offers 24/7 email support, ensuring users can get assistance at any time, typically within 24 hours. This round-the-clock availability is a significant advantage for users who may encounter issues outside of regular business hours.

On the other hand, Siter.io scores 4.1 in customer support. It primarily relies on its help center and articles to assist users. While email support is available, the platform does not specify the hours of operation, which may lead to delays in receiving help. This lack of clarity and limited support options can be a drawback for users needing timely assistance.

Security

SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:

  • Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
  • SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
  • Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
  • Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
6.8
7.6

🏆

Winner: Carrd

. Carrd’s security measures are more comprehensive and transparent than Siter.io’s. Carrd automatically enables SSL for all sites, ensuring data security and encryption. It also provides clear information about how it collects and uses personal data, and the measures it takes to protect this information.

Siter.io, on the other hand, does not provide much information about its security measures, apart from the use of free SSL certificates and a zero-knowledge storage system. While these features are important for security, the lack of transparency about other security measures is a concern.

AI Capabilities

AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:

  • Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
  • Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
  • AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
  • Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0.0
0.0
Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

Personalized Design







SEO Optimization







Customer Behavior Analysis







Sales Predictions







Inventory Management







Content Generation







🏆 Winner: None

. Neither Siter.io nor Carrd offer AI capabilities. Both platforms focus on providing a straightforward, user-friendly website building experience without the use of AI. While this may limit some advanced functionalities, it also simplifies the process, making these platforms accessible to users with little to no technical expertise.

User Management

User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:

  • Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
    permissions.
  • Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
  • Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
    levels.
  • Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.1
4.3


🏆 Winner: Siter.io

. Both Siter.io and Carrd offer user management features, but they approach it differently.

  • Siter.io focuses on its real-time collaborative features, offering varying numbers of editors depending on the plan. Each plan provides access for 2 to 6 editors who can edit and design websites, with the option to include additional editors for an extra fee.
  • Carrd is primarily designed for individual use or small teams, with each account managing its own sites. The platform introduced a Team feature to allow multiple users to collaborate, but traditionally, Carrd sites are managed by a single account holder with full control. The specifics of access levels and permissions for collaborators, if available, are less detailed but generally include editing capabilities.

Given the higher user management score and the more detailed user management features, Siter.io is the winner in this category.

Additional Features

Siter.io Logo
Carrd Logo

SSL Certificate







Custom Domain







Free Custom Domain Included







International Domains







Mobile Responsive







Page Speed







Website Builder Mobile App







Convert a Website To An App







Website Analytics







Multilingual Sites







Multiple Users






User Feedback

Siter.io
4 reviews
4.8 out of 5 stars
Carrd
31 reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars

Overall, users appreciate Siter.io for its user-friendly interface and robust features, such as the drag-and-drop editor and customizable templates, making website building accessible to teams without coding expertise. However, there’s a consensus that the platform could improve its integration options to enhance workflow efficiency further. Nevertheless, Siter.io effectively addresses the challenge of website creation without coding skills, benefiting designers, small business owners, and individuals seeking to establish an online presence or portfolio quickly and efficiently.

Users overwhelmingly praise Carrd for its user-friendly interface, excellent customer support, and attractive templates, making website creation effortless and enjoyable. The drag-and-drop builder, affordability, and mobile-friendly designs are highlighted as significant benefits. However, some users express limitations, such as the inability to create multi-page websites or a desire for more design options. Overall, Carrd is praised for its affordability, ease of use, and suitability for creating quick, simple webpages.

The making of this blog

We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.

FAQ

Which platform is better for beginners, Siter.io or Carrd?

Carrd is generally better for beginners due to its straightforward interface and focus on simplicity, scoring a solid 9.0 in ease of use. Siter.io, while user-friendly, offers unique features like Figma integration that might require a slight learning curve.

Can I use both Siter.io and Carrd for ecommerce?

Yes, both platforms offer basic ecommerce functionalities. Siter.io provides a shopping cart, checkout, and purchase button, while Carrd stands out for its direct integrations with PayPal and Stripe, making it slightly more favorable for users looking to quickly launch online stores.

How do Siter.io and Carrd differ in terms of design customization?

Both platforms offer robust design functionalities and templates. Siter.io includes customizable templates and a unique freehand design tool, along with Figma integration for importing designs. Carrd offers a wide variety of templates and designs, catering to different needs and preferences, with continuous updates to its library.

What are the major differences in pricing between Siter.io and Carrd?

Carrd offers more affordable pricing plans, making it a budget-friendly option for users needing to create simple, single-page websites. Siter.io’s plans are more expensive but include features like real-time collaboration and Figma integration, catering to users who prioritize design flexibility and collaboration.

Which platform offers better customer support, Siter.io or Carrd?

Carrd takes the lead in customer support with a score of 6.2, providing 24/7 support via email with responses typically within 24 hours. Siter.io offers support through its help center and articles, with email support available but without specified operation hours.

Are there any AI capabilities in Siter.io or Carrd?

Neither Siter.io nor Carrd offer AI capabilities. Both platforms focus on providing a straightforward, user-friendly website building experience without the use of AI, simplifying the process for users with little to no technical expertise.

Build your website in 1 minute

Share article

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your email address will never be published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Comment*

Name *