A2 Hosting vs MonoVM: guide for 2024

A2 Hosting vs MonoVM: Final verdict

Looking over A2 Hosting vs. MonoVM, both have their strengths but cater to different needs and user preferences.

• 
  A2 Hosting (Overall grade: 8.1)
  
  offers robust options with Shared, WordPress, VPS, and Dedicated hosting plans, making it a versatile choice for a variety of users. Notable highlights include exceptional uptime, multiple speed-boosting features like Turbo Servers and NVMe SSD storage, and comprehensive support. A2 Hosting excels particularly in speed and reliability, boasting a 99.9% uptime guarantee often hitting 100% in tests. It also supports user-friendly management through cPanel, enhanced by Softaculous for effortless setup and maintenance. However, its plans can be pricier, especially upon renewal, which may not appeal to budget-conscious users.
• 
  MonoVM (Overall grade: 6.9)
  
  shines with its VPS and Dedicated hosting offerings, backed by high-speed performance and strong customer support. Users benefit from enterprise-grade SSDs, extensive global availability, and robust security measures, including Imunify360 and dedicated firewalls. MonoVM provides a tailored experience with certified IT support and flexible email hosting options. Despite these strengths, it falls short in uptime compared to A2 Hosting and lacks specific details on automatic scaling and some advanced customization features. Its plans may appeal more to users prioritizing budget-friendly VPS and Dedicated servers over top-tier uptime and the fastest speeds.

Hosting types offered

Both platforms provide a variety of hosting types, each designed to meet the different needs of users.

Although both offer a variety of hosting plans tailored to different needs, in
certain cases, one platform may prove to be more suitable.

Detailed comparison

🏆 Winner A2 Hosting: Exceptional uptime performance and reliability over recent years.

A2 Hosting boasts outstanding uptime percentages, consistently maintaining near-perfect scores from 2020 to 2022. The provider guarantees a 99.9% uptime for its users, though recent testing achieved a perfect 100%, reflecting its commitment to reliability. With such stellar performance metrics, A2 Hosting stands out as a top choice for those prioritizing uptime.

MonoVM, while offering impressive global availability and a wide range of features, reports an overall uptime of 99.8%. Despite its robust hardware and extensive customer support, this uptime figure slightly trails behind A2 Hosting’s results. MonoVM provides valuable services, particularly for users seeking multiple server locations and premium hardware options.

🏆 Winner: MonoVM: Offers high-performance hardware, robust security, and reliable customer support.

When it comes to general performance, both A2 Hosting and MonoVM excel in different areas. A2 Hosting emphasizes speed with its 20x Faster Turbo servers, NVMe Drives, and various caching methods like Turbo Cache and APC/opcache. In contrast, MonoVM utilizes enterprise-grade SSDs in RAID10 configuration, contributing to fast load times. A2 Hosting provides multiple global data centers, while MonoVM’s details on CDN and data centers are less specific. Both offer great support, but MonoVM’s promise of a 99.99% uptime guarantee is slightly more robust.

Website Speed

A2 Hosting promotes speed with multiple features such as LiteSpeed Speed Enhanced Web Server, NVMe drives, and optimized plugins. Their AMD EPYC CPUs promise up to 40% faster performance, making them a strong candidate for speed. MonoVM also uses SSDs in RAID10, which provides excellent load times but doesn’t offer the same level of detailed speed optimization technologies as A2 Hosting. Therefore, A2 Hosting might be a better choice for those focused purely on achieving the fastest website speeds.

Scalability

A2 Hosting provides completely scalable plans involving Shared, Managed WordPress, VPS, and Dedicated Server Hosting, ensuring that as websites grow, the hosting plan can be easily upgraded. Their VPS hosting starts at $35.99/mo and Dedicated Server Hosting at $79.99/mo. MonoVM’s scalability specifics aren’t detailed, particularly in relation to automatic scaling, but they do offer both Linux and Windows hosting with managed options. The dedicated server costs for MonoVM are not provided, making A2 Hosting more transparent in this aspect.

🏆 Winner
MonoVM: A robust suite of security features with high reliability and extensive monitoring capabilities.

Both MonoVM and A2 Hosting, have notable differences in their approaches to technical and operational
security, as well as in their compliance with regulations.

Technical security measures:

A2 Hosting offers an array of technical security measures such as free SSL certificates, Imunify360 for real-time protection, and TLS 1.2 and 1.3. MonoVM matches A2 Hosting with SSL certificates and Imunify360 but adds a dedicated firewall specifically for WordPress Hosting. Both providers support various PHP versions, though only A2 Hosting details these versions explicitly. Additionally, A2 Hosting implements ModSecurity, Virus Scanner, and Patchman, which are not mentioned for MonoVM.

Operational security measures:

Operationally, A2 Hosting includes features like Two-Factor Authentication (2FA), hotlink protection, and reCAPTCHA, enhancing user interaction and login security. They also offer SSH for safer file transfers and automatic security scans for outdated WordPress applications. MonoVM complements these with data encryption for email hosting, daily to monthly automatic backups, and comprehensive email security measures. MonoVM also provides logging and monitoring tools, essential for identifying security threats.

Compliance and certifications:

A2 Hosting ensures GDPR compliance and provides guidance for achieving PCI compliance via third-party providers, but it lacks HIPAA and SSAE 16 compliance. MonoVM, while not explicitly stating GDPR or PCI compliance, emphasizes robust security measures suggesting high standards. Neither provider supports HIPAA compliance.

🏆 Winner
A2 Hosting: Renowned for its versatile hosting solutions and exceptional performance.

A2 Hosting and MonoVM both offer robust hosting services, though they cater to different user preferences and needs. A2 Hosting provides a broad range of hosting options, including Shared, Managed WordPress, VPS, Dedicated Server, and Reseller Hosting. This variety ensures that both beginners and advanced users can find suitable plans tailored to their needs. The inclusion of features like free website migration, Turbo Servers for faster load times, and a detailed 24/7 support system makes it an attractive option for users who prioritize performance and reliability. MonoVM, on the other hand, incorporates unique features such as DNS and mailbox management, daily backups, and unlimited monthly traffic. The focus on enterprise-grade hardware and multiple OS support ensures high performance and flexibility, appealing to users with more complex requirements.

In terms of usability and customization, A2 Hosting shines with its cPanel control panel, which simplifies website management even for inexperienced users. The TurboHub control panel for WordPress hosting is another highlight, offering a seamless and optimized experience for WordPress enthusiasts. A2 Hosting’s automatic updates and A2 Optimized Plugin further enhance user experience by maintaining site speed and security. MonoVM also offers a cPanel interface, but stands out with its powerful logging and monitoring tools and the ability to automate various tasks. While both providers do not explicitly offer a specific website builder, A2 Hosting’s Softaculous feature enables the easy installation of popular content management systems, paving the way for site customization. MonoVM’s automation capabilities ensure a less hand-on approach to maintenance, enticing users who prefer streamlined management.

Both providers support a range of users from beginners to experts with user-friendly website builders and WordPress staging areas. However, in terms of developer tools, both A2 Hosting and MonoVM offer robust options including SSH access, support for multiple programming languages, and Git for version control, thus appealing to developers looking for advanced capabilities.

Email services:

A2 Hosting’s email hosting, powered by Titan, offers multi-account access, configurable webmail and mobile apps, and more, which is ideal for users looking for comprehensive email solutions. MonoVM provides robust mailbox management and the capability to handle transactional emails, making it suitable for both personal and business use. Both providers include free SSL certificates, which is a significant plus for secure email communication. While A2 Hosting focuses on a more integrated email solution with added features, MonoVM leverages its enterprise-grade hardware to ensure high performance and reliability.

🏆 Winner MonoVM:MonoVM scores slightly higher overall, mainly due to the robust features included in their plans and the transparency of what’s included.

Evaluating the pricing of plans among various hosting providers can be complex due to their differing pricing and renewal strategies. Additionally, certain plans require annual commitments, which adds to the difficulty of making comparisons. The prices listed are based on monthly commitments; plans requiring annual commitments are indicated. Additionally, although some providers offer identical plans for WordPress and shared hosting, we have created separate tables for each to enhance clarity.

A comparison of A2 Hosting and MonoVM shows that each provider offers diverse hosting plans tailored for various user needs. A2 Hosting presents competitive prices, starting from $2.99/mo for their entry-level shared hosting plan, offers up to unlimited websites and NVMe SSD storage in their higher plans, and promises enhanced speeds with Turbo features. MonoVM, priced starting from $8.33/mo for managed WordPress hosting, includes comprehensive features like VIP support, malware scanning, and flexible domain handling. Notably, MonoVM’s plans tend to offer extra website handling and storage capacity, emphasizing their usability for more extensive site needs. Both providers offer diverse pricing strategies with unique perks, making them strong contenders in the hosting market.

Enterprise plans

For enterprises, A2 Hosting offers the Warp 1 plan featuring robust hardware specifications, including a Xeon E-2224 4.6GHz CPU, 2TB SSD storage, and 16GB RAM, with managed security and root access. MonoVM’s offerings lean more towards comprehensive managed WordPress and web hosting solutions with extensive support and higher storage capacity, but lack a dedicated server option to match A2 Hosting’s enterprise-level specifications.

🏆 Winner
MonoVM: MonoVM provides a comprehensive and user-friendly hosting service with extensive support to ensure ease of setup and ongoing management.

Both A2 Hosting and MonoVM offer cPanel as their web hosting control panel, but they differ in additional tools and accessibility. A2 Hosting enhances its cPanel with Softaculous, allowing auto-installation of popular software and making setup effortless for non-technical users. Their TurboHub and WordPress Toolkit further streamline site management. In contrast, MonoVM uses standard cPanel but adds valuable features like CMS installation, email setup, and theme installation within their Managed Hosting service. Both hosting providers ensure user-friendly experiences, but A2 Hosting’s added features provide more streamlined management tools.

A2 Hosting and MonoVM offer various site migration tools. A2 Hosting includes free site migration, which helps transfer from another host with minimal downtime. MonoVM also provides website transfer assistance, handled by their experts to ensure a smooth transition. Both offer these services for free, facilitating an easy and swift migration process.

A2 Hosting maintains a comprehensive knowledge base with various categories and articles, though currently available only in English. Their 24/7/365 Guru Crew Support offers multiple contact methods for quick assistance. MonoVM’s knowledge base includes tech updates, tutorials, and in-depth explanations, supplemented by 24/7 support from certified IT experts and VIP support for personalized assistance. Whether through articles or direct support, both providers offer accessible and valuable help center resources.

The platforms provide extensive knowledge bases filled with guides, how-to articles, and instructional content. A2 Hosting offers a wide range of resources alongside 24/7 chat and phone support. MonoVM also boasts a detailed help center with an intuitive search function and around-the-clock support via live chat, phone, and ticketing, ensuring comprehensive user support.

🏆 Winner A2 Hosting: Offers comprehensive user management via Plesk.

A2 Hosting leverages Plesk to manage user roles, permissions, and accessibility efficiently. Plesk provides clear procedures for creating, managing, and removing user roles, making it simple to adapt user settings as needed. Users can define specific access permissions, ensuring only necessary services are granted or denied per role. MonoVM, on the other hand, does not provide specific details about its user management capabilities, resulting in less clarity and flexibility in managing user roles and permissions.

Using Plesk, A2 Hosting offers a straightforward user interface for user management. The process involves clear steps, starting from logging into Plesk, navigating to the Users and User Roles tabs, and making necessary adjustments. This ease of use provides a smooth experience for administrators. In contrast, MonoVM lacks transparent details about its interface and tools for managing users, making it difficult to assess its effectiveness.

A2 Hosting ensures effective access control measures through its detailed management abilities within Plesk. It accommodates a growing number of users by allowing intricate user role definitions and continuous management options. The A2 Hosting approach is systematic and scales appropriately with user demands. With no available data, MonoVM’s capability to manage access control and scalability remains uncertain, impacting its reliability for larger teams or projects.

A2 Hosting User Roles Table:

🏆 Winner MonoVM: MonoVM stands out with certified IT experts and a multitude of support features including VIP support and enterprise-level security.

A2 Hosting and MonoVM both offer a variety of customer support options, including phone and live chat support, as well as email and ticket-based support channels. A2 Hosting provides 24/7 availability through its Guru Crew support team, known for its expertise in technical issues. Customer reviews for A2 Hosting highlight the friendly and prompt assistance of their support team, with multiple channels to ensure queries are promptly addressed.

In comparison, MonoVM also offers 24/7 support from certified IT experts proficient in both software and hardware-related issues. Unlike A2 Hosting, MonoVM includes VIP support for Managed Hosting and WordPress Web Hosting services, making it more attractive for users seeking premium assistance. With additional enterprise-level support options and a suite of security features, MonoVM provides a comprehensive support experience for its users.

A2 Hosting vs MonoVM: User feedback

User feedback on A2 Hosting is largely positive, highlighting its impressive website speed, reliable uptime, and exceptional customer support. Many users appreciate the ease of use, feature-rich plans, and the effectiveness of technical support, though a few reported prolonged resolution times and inadequate initial support knowledge. A common criticism is the higher-than-average pricing, especially upon renewal, yet users often acknowledge that the quality of service justifies the cost. Some isolated issues like service disruptions and inefficient overseas support were mentioned, but overall, A2 Hosting earns strong recommendations from its user base.

MonoVM is recognized for offering an affordable array of services, including VPS hosting, web hosting, domain registration, and SSL certificates. Users appreciate its reliability and the user-friendly interfaces that ease account management and support access. However, some customers note that MonoVM lacks certain advanced features and customization options, particularly in higher-tier plans, and may experience limitations in resource scaling and upgrading. Additionally, there are mentions of compromised customer support quality.

A2 Hosting vs MonoVM: FAQ