Kinsta vs Rocket.net: Final verdict
Looking over Kinsta vs. Rocket.net, it’s clear why both hosts are so popular. They have both hosted millions of
websites that run on WordPress for decades, building up a loyal customer base.
-
Rocket.net (Overall grade: 8.3)
delivers dependable hosting with a 99% uptime guarantee and rapid response times. Its 275+ global edge locations, strong security tools including a Web Application Firewall (WAF), and unlimited free migrations make it an excellent choice for WordPress hosting. Rocket.net’s focus on speed, with an average TTFB of around 70ms, is significantly faster than Kinsta. The hosting provider also supports ecommerce websites well, due to its advanced features and solid infrastructure. However, Rocket.net’s higher traffic capacities and edge network capabilities might appeal more to technical users and large agencies requiring extensive control and speed.
Kinsta (Overall grade: 8.5)
offers high-performance managed WordPress hosting with a 99.9% uptime guarantee, leveraging the Google Cloud Platform with 35 data centers worldwide. Enhanced by Cloudflare integration, Kinsta ensures superior performance and security with proactive monitoring and quick engineer responses to potential issues. It excels in handling high-traffic and multimedia websites, thanks to its high-performance CDN and media handling capabilities. Kinsta’s easy-to-use MyKinsta dashboard, rich feature set, and excellent customer support make it a robust choice for those seeking reliable, user-friendly hosting solutions. The relatively high pricing and traffic limitations on lower-tier plans are minor drawbacks, but the comprehensive feature set and strong support justify the costs for many users.
 Overall grade:8.5 |
 Overall grade:8.3 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Uptime and Availability | 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Hosting Performance | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Hosting Security | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Price | 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Hosting Features | 6.7 | 4.6 |
| Ease Of Setup | 9.3 | 9.1 |
| User Management | 7.6 | 8.5 |
| Customer Support | 8.2 | 9.2 |
| User feedback | 4.8/5 | 5/5 |
Hosting types offered
Both platforms provide a variety of hosting types, each designed to meet the different needs of users.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Shared hosting | ||
| Cloud hosting | ||
| WordPress hosting | ||
| Ecommerce hosting | ||
| VPS hosting | ||
| Dedicated hosting |
Although both offer a variety of hosting plans tailored to different needs, in
certain cases, one platform may prove to be more suitable.
Detailed comparison
Uptime and availability
Evaluates the average uptime statistics, uptime guarantee and overall availability of the hosting
provider
Score Components:
- Uptime percentage (30%): evaluates the uptime statistics in given period of time
- Uptime guarantee (20%): Assesses if the platform offers an uptime guarantee and
whether the actual uptime matches the promised guarantee. - General performance (25%): Evaluates how fast is the average response time and overall
it’s stability. - Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Availability (25%): Reflects the total downtime and number of outages.
9.7
8.6
🏆 Winner Kinsta: Kinsta offers unparalleled reliability and performance for your WordPress hosting needs.
Kinsta thrives with a 99.9% uptime guarantee backed by outstanding test results, assuring customers of near-perfect availability. Powered by the Google Cloud Platform and enhanced by Cloudflare integration, Kinsta ensures high performance and security. Their proactive monitoring checks every site every 3 minutes, with swift engineer responses to potential issues, solidifying Kinsta’s commitment to uptime.
Rocket.net provides a dependable hosting solution with a 99% uptime guarantee and fast response times. Featuring 275+ global edge locations and a suite of security tools like WAF and malware protection, Rocket.net is a solid choice for WordPress hosting. With unlimited free migrations, 24/7 support, and advanced features such as Enterprise CDN, Rocket.net remains a competitive option for many users.
Which one has better hosting performance?
Score Components:
- Hosting speed (30%): This includes SSD quality, Load times, PageSpeed score ranges,
additional information on website speed, built-in plugins for performance enhancement, available caching
methods, and CPU/RAM options - CDN (20%): Considers whether CDN is available or not, whether it’s free or paid, and
the quality of the CDN service - Available data centers (30%): Evaluates the number of data centers and their locations
globally. - Scalibility (20%): Looks at whether elastic scaling is available, the process required
to scale (manual upgrade vs. automatic scaling), the presence of dedicated servers, and the costs
associated with scaling.
9.1
9.1
🏆 Winner
Rocket.net: Known for exceptional speed and edge network capabilities. When comparing the general performance between Kinsta and Rocket.net, both hosting services offer impressive features. Kinsta utilizes Google Cloud Platform’s premium network, with 35 global data centers and Cloudflare integration for improved security and performance. Rocket.net, on the other hand, boasts 275+ worldwide edge locations, a free enterprise-grade CDN, and optimized full-page caching for WordPress. Kinsta’s infrastructure includes fast C2 and C3D virtual machines while Rocket.net leverages Enterprise NVMe servers and pre-configured optimizations. Both offer high-speed load times with Rocket.net showing commendable performance in average TTFB metrics.
Kinsta and Rocket.net both offer SSD storage and free CDN integration to enhance hosting performance and speed.
Website Speed
Rocket.net exhibits a notable edge in website speed with an average TTFB of approximately 70ms, significantly outperforming Kinsta’s TTFB of around 504ms. This speed advantage is backed by Rocket.net’s smart full-page caching and edge network, which contribute to faster load times. Kinsta also delivers quick performance with features such as edge caching, image optimization, and continuous MySQL database optimization, but the TTFB metrics make Rocket.net the faster choice.
Scalability
Both Kinsta and Rocket.net provide scalable solutions but through different methodologies. Kinsta offers flexibility with unlimited users, one-click backup, and staging environments, alongside various pricing tiers for application and database hosting. Scaling in Kinsta requires upgrading plans as resource needs grow. We don’t have specific information on Rocket.net’s elastic scaling or dedicated server offerings. The cost implications for scaling on Rocket.net are not detailed, so it might require direct contact for precise pricing. Both platforms offer transparent pricing structures with no hidden fees.
Which one has better security features?
and regulatory requirements
Score Components:
- Technical security measures (40%): This includes encryption, firewalls, DDoS
protection, secure configurations, server monitoring, access control and availability of security addons
(e.g Sitelock security). - Operational security measures (30%): Encompasses data privacy, backups and data
redundancy. - Compliance and certifications (20%): Adherence to legal and regulatory requirements
(e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) and possession of certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2). - Business and reliability (10%): Factors in the provider’s reputation, uptime
guarantees, and customer support.
8.9
9.1
🏆 Winner: Rocket.net: Offering robust security features suitable for various compliance needs.
Kinsta and Rocket.net both provide strong technical security measures
Technical security measures:
Kinsta offers free SSL certificates with automatic renewals, proactive site monitoring every 3 minutes, and multiple backup options including hourly and daily backups. Rocket.net, on the other hand, provides unlimited free SSL certificates and comprehensive real-time malware protection with zero performance impact through Imunify360. Both platforms support multiple PHP versions, but Rocket.net includes automatic updates for WordPress core, plugins, and themes, further enhancing secure operations.
Operational security measures:
When it comes to operational security, Kinsta utilizes a fully managed Web Application Firewall (WAF) with DDoS protection from Cloudflare and Google Cloud, along with free malware removal services. Additionally, Kinsta provides additional features such as edge caching and automatic image optimization. Rocket.net employs an enterprise-level WAF on their Enterprise Edge and real-time security reporting, giving users detailed insights into prevented attacks. Rocket.net also offers always-on protection and automatic updates which help maintain up-to-date security measures across all hosted sites.
Compliance and certifications:
Kinsta and Rocket.net are committed to compliance with major regulatory requirements. Kinsta is SOC 2 compliant and follows GDPR regulations, ensuring high standards for data protection and privacy. Rocket.net also adheres to GDPR and provides PCI compliance for every WordPress install, meeting stringent security requirements which make it ideal for eCommerce sites. Information about HIPAA compliance is not specified for either hosting provider.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
SSL certificate |
Free SSL certificates |
Unlimited free SSL certificates |
Additional security features |
Edge caching, proactive monitoring |
Bruteforce protection, automated bot protection |
PHP versions |
Selectable through dashboard |
Multiple PHP versions supported |
GDPR compliance |
Yes |
Yes |
HIPAA compliance |
Not specified |
Not specified |
PCI compliance |
Infrastructure supports compliance |
Every install is PCI compliant |
Hosting features
Score Components:
- Domains (20%): Assesses the availability of a free domain, domain purchase options, and
pricing - Email (15%): Considers if the provider offers full email hosting, or is reselling
third-party service, and if the email is only transactional or not - Website builder (15%): Checks if website builder is available, and it’s user
friendliness and overall the level of customization allowed. - Staging environment (20%): Determines if a staging environment is available, allowing
for testing changes before going live. - FTP & SFTP accounts (10%): Evaluates if and how easily users can access FTP and
SFTP accounts - Git and SSH access (20%): Assess whether Git is integrated into the hosting service and
if SSH access is provided
6.7
4.6
🏆 Winner
Kinsta: A feature-rich hosting provider known for its easy-to-use control panel and reliable site performance.
When it comes to hosting features, both Kinsta and Rocket.net offer a robust selection aimed at providing users with top-notch performance and security. Kinsta is geared towards simplicity and user-friendliness, featuring an intuitive control panel that allows users to manage their hosting needs without hassle. Rocket.net, on the other hand, places a heavy emphasis on advanced security measures, offering a unique combination of a Website Firewall (WAF) and real-time analytics to help users keep their sites secure. While Rocket.net provides valuable tools such as Brotli Compression and an Enterprise Edge CDN for speed enhancements, Kinsta offers a straightforward experience that may appeal more to those looking for a simple setup process.
Kinsta’s key strengths include the ability to easily manage SFTP and SSH access through its MyKinsta dashboard, and one-click staging environments for trialing new site features. Meanwhile, Rocket.net offers a more technical approach with features tailored to experienced developers, including key-based SSH access and unlimited PHP workers. Rocket.net’s free WooCommerce migrations without downtime is a clear benefit for eCommerce sites. Although both providers include essential features like free SSL and staging environments, Rocket.net’s additional offerings such as detailed CDN analytics and free test migrations could be deciding factors for more advanced users.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Free domain | No | No |
| Free SSL | Yes | Yes |
| Email hosting | No | No |
| Website builder | Yes | Yes |
| Staging environment | Yes | Yes |
| FTP & SFTP accounts | Yes | Yes |
| Git and SSH access | Yes | Yes |
| Free backup | Yes | No |
| Money back guarantee | Yes, 30 days | Yes, 30 days |
Both providers support a range of users from beginners to experts with user-friendly website builders and WordPress staging areas. However, in terms of developer tools, both Kinsta and Rocket.net offer robust options including SSH access, support for multiple programming languages, and Git for version control, thus appealing to developers looking for advanced capabilities.
Email services:
Neither Kinsta nor Rocket.net provides standalone email hosting services, but both support transactional email capabilities through the use of plugins and third-party integrations. Users looking to set up email campaigns or manage their email through popular services like Google Workspace or Outlook will need to integrate these separately. Rocket.net does offer some options to resell third-party services which can be an advantage for users needing comprehensive email solutions within their hosting plan.
Price
Score Components:
- Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
- Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
- Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
- Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.8
8.3
🏆 Winner Kinsta:Offers a wider range of hosting options and superior value for the price.
Evaluating the pricing of plans among various hosting providers can be complex due to their differing pricing and renewal strategies. Additionally, certain plans require annual commitments, which adds to the difficulty of making comparisons. The prices listed are based on monthly commitments; plans requiring annual commitments are indicated. Additionally, although some providers offer identical plans for WordPress and shared hosting, we have created separate tables for each to enhance clarity.
When comparing the pricing plans of Kinsta and Rocket.net, Kinsta provides a more extensive variety of hosting options, appealing to a broader range of requirements, including managed WordPress hosting, application hosting, database hosting, and static site hosting. Kinsta’s Managed WordPress Hosting offers multiple tiers, starting with the Starter Plan at $35/month and extending to extensive Enterprise plans. Rocket.net, while featuring competitive pricing starting from $30/month for its Starter Plan, emphasizes higher visitor capacities and unlimited PHP workers. Both providers include essential features like free SSL, daily backups, and malware protection, but Kinsta stands out due to its expansive plan selections and value-added offerings.
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
Starter Plan$35
1 website, 10GB storage, 25,000 visits, free CDN, 14 days backup Value for price:8.0
|
Starter Plan$30
1 website, 10GB storage, 250,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
|
Pro Plan$70
2 websites, 20GB storage, 50,000 visits, free CDN, 14 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
Pro Plan$60
3 websites, 20GB storage, 1,000,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.8
|
|
Business 1 Plan$115
5 websites, 30GB storage, 100,000 visits, free CDN, 14 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
Business Plan$100
10 websites, 40GB storage, 2,500,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.7
|
|
Business 2 Plan$225
10 websites, 40GB storage, 250,000 visits, free CDN, 14 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
N/A |
|
Business 3 Plan$340
20 websites, 50GB storage, 400,000 visits, free CDN, 20 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
Expert Plan$200
25 websites, 50GB storage, 5,000,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.6
|
|
Business 4 Plan$450
40 websites, 60GB storage, 600,000 visits, free CDN, 20 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
N/A |
|
Enterprise Plansstarting $675
60+ websites, 100+GB storage, 1,000,000+ visits, free CDN, 30 days backup Value for price:8.9
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
Hobby Plan$7
0.3 CPU, 0.3GB RAM Value for price:7.5
|
N/A |
|
Standard 1$20
0.5 CPU, 1GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
Starter Plan$30
1 website, 10GB storage, 250,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.5
|
|
Standard 2$40
1 CPU, 2GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
Pro Plan$60
3 websites, 20GB storage, 1,000,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.8
|
|
Standard 3$80
2 CPU, 4GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
Business Plan$100
10 websites, 40GB storage, 2,500,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.7
|
|
Standard 4$160
4 CPU, 8GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
Expert Plan$200
25 websites, 50GB storage, 5,000,000 visits, enterprise CDN, unlimited PHP workers, 14 days backup Value for price:8.6
|
|
Memory Optimized 1$35
0.5 CPU, 2GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
N/A |
|
CPU Optimized 1$36
1 CPU, 1GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
Build Standard Plan$0.02/min
1 CPU, 4GB RAM Value for price:7.8
|
N/A |
|
Build Medium Plan$0.05/min
8 CPU, 8GB RAM Value for price:8.0
|
N/A |
|
Build Plus Plan$0.18/min
32 CPU, 32GB RAM Value for price:8.3
|
N/A |
Enterprise plans
Kinsta doesn’t have enterprise plans, but their VPS and dedicated hosting plans may be suitable the needs of larger businesses or enterprises. Rocket.net does not have dedicated or VPS hosting options, however the platform offers Reseller Hosting and plans for specifically for agencies, which can be suitable for enterprises.
Kinsta vs Rocket.net: Ease of setup
platform.
Score Components:
- Site migration (25%): Assesses whether the provider offers tools for site migration,
either automated or manual, and whether these services are free or require a fee. - Admin panel usability (35%): Evaluates the type of admin panel provided, such as the
standard cPanel or a custom solution, focusing on its accessibility and user-friendliness for both
technical and non-technical users. - Setup features (20%): Examines the availability and ease of use of various setup
features, including FTP accounts, file managers, email account setup, PHPMyAdmin, and easy CDN
configuration. - Help center quality (20%): Measures the quality and accessibility of the provider’s
help center resources, including articles and tutorials.
9.3
9.1
🏆 Winner Kinsta: Provides a more user-friendly setup experience with extensive support options.
Kinsta’s admin panel, known as the MyKinsta dashboard, is a custom-built solution designed for ease of use. Its features include one-click backup creation, easy cache management, and simple PHP version selection. The dashboard is intuitive, making it suitable for both technical and non-technical users. Advanced functionalities like staging environments further simplify website management tasks. Additionally, MyKinsta’s sleek interface contributes to a streamlined user experience.
Rocket.net, on the other hand, offers a more traditional WordPress control panel. It integrates speed and security features directly into the WordPress admin interface. This panel includes functionalities for easy site creation, one-click staging, and site cloning, making it user-friendly. Rocket.net provides a way to deploy WordPress with enterprise-level CDN and WAF pre-configured, thus reducing the complexity for users. However, the overall customization and accessibility are somewhat less refined compared to Kinsta’s offering.
Both Kinsta and Rocket.net offer free migration services, ensuring a seamless transition from other hosting providers. Kinsta allows users to request migration through their MyKinsta dashboard, where support handles the entire process. They offer both basic and premium migrations with zero downtime. Rocket.net also provides unlimited free migrations, with their support team managing the process, including detailed migration steps. Both services thus prioritize hassle-free migrations, though Rocket.net slightly simplifies the steps involved.
Kinsta provides a comprehensive help center with a knowledge base covering various topics, from account questions to development environment and general WordPress queries. They offer 24/7 live expert support via chat with experienced developers and engineers. Rocket.net also offers 24/7 support via live chat, email, and phone, guaranteeing a 60-second response time for WooCommerce customers. Their knowledge base includes real-time analytics and powerful reporting features for site performance insights. Both hosting providers offer extensive documentation and support, though Kinsta’s proactive monitoring and developer-focused resources give it an edge.
User management
accessibility.
Score Components:
- Role customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
permissions. - Ease of management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
- Access control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
levels. - Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.6
8.5
🏆 Winner
Rocket.net: Offers comprehensive user management with enhanced control panel features for better accessibility.
Kinsta and Rocket.net both provide robust user management capabilities, but they differ in their approach to creating and managing user roles. Kinsta allows for different levels of company roles, including owners, administrators, and developers, who can add users, manage access, and ensure appropriate access levels. Rocket.net, however, provides a unique feature allowing customers to create sub-users with specific site access, making it ideal for agencies needing selective site control. Both platforms require users to safeguard credentials and enable two-factor authentication, though Rocket.net’s recent feature launch adds a layer of flexibility that sets it apart.
Kinsta provides a user-friendly interface through MyKinsta, where users can manage their accounts, enable 2FA, and control site resources. It focuses on company-wide user management and integrating with Git for version control. Rocket.net, on the other hand, emphasizes site-specific user management through its newly developed Users section, allowing for site-level control and white-label control panels. The Rocket.net interface offers room for growth with future enhancements, including logo customization, offering a more personalized user experience than Kinsta.
When it comes to access control measures, both platforms ensure secure management. Kinsta’s focus is on the customer’s responsibility to maintain proper access levels and secure their content, plugins, and themes. Rocket.net allows for easier scaling with site-level user roles and roaming profiles, ensuring that access control remains manageable even with increasing users. This capability is particularly beneficial for agencies and businesses managing multiple sites, allowing them to efficiently assign and control access.
Kinsta user roles table:
| Role | Description | Access highlights |
|---|---|---|
| Company Owners | Overall account management and administration | Full access to add/remove users and manage user levels |
| Company Administrators | Similar to owners but typically with operational control | Can add and remove users, manage access levels |
| Company Developers | Development and technical roles | View users, grant access to WordPress sites |
Rocket.net user roles table:
| Role | Description | Access highlights |
|---|---|---|
| Site Users | Users granted access to specific sites | Can log in to control panel, manage site(s) they’re assigned |
Customer support
hosting provider.
Score Components:
- Support communication channels (30%): Measures the variety of customer support types
provided (live chat, chatbot, email, phone, etc.) - Availability (20%): Assesses the availability hours for each channel, including 24/7
support options. - Technical support quality (30%): Assesses whether the provider offers comprehensive
technical support, including hardware upgrades (e.g., HDD to SSD), software installations, and web
server configuration changes. - Enterprise support (20%): Checks if there are dedicated or priority support services
for enterprise-level customers.
8.2
9.2
🏆 Winner Rocket.net: Offers comprehensive customer support with rapid response times and extensive migration options.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Phone support |
||
Live chat support |
||
Chatbot |
||
Email/ticket support |
||
Enterprise support (dedicated agent, priority support) |
Kinsta and Rocket.net both provide round-the-clock customer support, but there are differences in their offerings. Kinsta caters to multiple languages, offers proactive site monitoring every three minutes, and utilizes human-only expert support via live chat and email. Rocket.net, on the other hand, stands out with its faster response times, providing live chat responses in just 45 seconds and email responses within six minutes. Rocket.net also features free and unlimited WordPress and WooCommerce migrations, ensuring a smooth transition for customers.
For enterprise-level support, Rocket.net offers dedicated assistance through a private Slack channel and a specific phone number, which Kinsta lacks. While both have extensive knowledge bases, Rocket.net’s customer testimonials highlight the speed and quality of their support, describing it as “phenomenal” and “world-class.” Kinsta provides a strong support foundation, but Rocket.net’s quicker response times and additional migration features give it the edge.
Kinsta vs Rocket.net: User feedback
User feedback for Kinsta highlights its exceptional speed, reliability, and user-friendly interface, making it a top choice for WordPress hosting. Users appreciate the responsive and knowledgeable customer support, daily backups, and smooth site migration process. However, some reviewers noted the relatively high pricing and limitations in monthly traffic for lower-tier plans, which can be a concern for budget-conscious users. Overall, Kinsta’s robust performance and effective support have earned it high praise and a loyal customer base.
Users highly praise Rocket.net for its superior support, user-friendly interface, and top-notch security features. The integration with Cloudflare Enterprise and the inclusion of an Enterprise CDN are standout benefits, saving users money and reducing the need for additional plugins. Customers appreciate the platform’s powerful features, including staging areas, manual backups, and integrated file management. While feedback is overwhelmingly positive, a minor suggestion includes the addition of more analytic tools.
Kinsta vs Rocket.net: FAQ
Which platform is better suited for hosting WordPress websites?
Both Kinsta and Rocket.net are well-suited for hosting WordPress websites, offering advanced features and robust support tailored for WordPress projects. Rocket.net excels with its rapid response times and superior speed metrics, while Kinsta leverages the Google Cloud Platform for enhanced performance and reliability. Ultimately, the choice would depend on specific needs such as speed, traffic handling, and budget.
Which hosting service offers better security features?
Both Kinsta and Rocket.net provide strong security features, but they differ in their approaches. Kinsta offers free SSL certificates, proactive site monitoring every 3 minutes, and a fully managed WAF with DDoS protection. Rocket.net provides unlimited free SSL certificates, an enterprise-level WAF, real-time malware protection through Imunify360, and automated updates for WordPress core, plugins, and themes, ensuring comprehensive security.
What are the major differences in pricing and value between kinsta and rocketnet?
Kinsta offers a wider range of hosting plans, starting from $35/month for the Starter Plan, while Rocket.net’s plans start at $30/month. Kinsta’s pricing ranges broadly to accommodate various needs, including application and database hosting. Rocket.net focuses on high visitor capacities and includes unlimited PHP workers in its plans. Both provide essential features like free SSL and backups, but Kinsta’s expansive plan options and user-friendly control panel offer superior value for many users.
Which platform offers better customer support?
Both Kinsta and Rocket.net offer 24/7 customer support, but Rocket.net stands out with faster response times, providing live chat responses in just 45 seconds and email responses within six minutes. Rocket.net also offers dedicated enterprise-level support through a private Slack channel and specific phone number. Kinsta provides strong support with proactive monitoring and expert live chat, making both platforms reliable, although Rocket.net edges out with quicker assistance and extensive migration options.
What are the differences in the control panels offered by each hosting service?
Kinsta offers the custom-built MyKinsta dashboard designed for ease of use, featuring one-click backup creation, easy cache management, and simple PHP version selection. Rocket.net’s control panel integrates speed and security features directly into the WordPress admin interface, simplifying site creation and enhancing security. While Kinsta focuses on user-friendly interfaces for both technical and non-technical users, Rocket.net offers a more traditional yet enhanced approach tailored for advanced users.
The making of this blog
We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.
