Web.com vs Web Hosting Pad: guide for 2024

Web.com vs Web Hosting Pad: Final verdict

Looking at Web.com vs. WebHostingPad, Web.com emerges as the stronger option due to its superior performance and range of features.

• 
  Web.com (Overall grade: 7.3)
  
  impresses with its strong guaranteed uptime, fast server speeds, and comprehensive security measures including a variety of SSL certificates, SiteLock, and CodeGuard. Its drag-and-drop website builder and robust business email hosting make it user-friendly, especially for agencies and high-traffic websites. Additionally, Web.com’s scalability and extensive customer support, including 24/7 monitoring, add to its overall reliability and user experience.
• 
  WebHostingPad (Overall grade: 6.1)
  
  stands out for its affordability, making it an appealing choice for those on a budget. It offers unlimited hosting space, bandwidth, and domains even on basic plans, along with a free Weebly site builder and free SSL certificates. However, some of its features and hardware specifications are less detailed, and its 99.9% uptime guarantee comes with notable exclusions. Although it provides strong customer support and useful features for ecommerce, its overall performance and advanced features fall short when compared to Web.com.

Hosting types offered

Both platforms provide a variety of hosting types, each designed to meet the different needs of users.

Although both offer a variety of hosting plans tailored to different needs, in certain cases, one platform may prove to be more suitable.

Detailed comparison

Winner Web.com: Web.com excels in providing a reliable hosting service with an emphasis on uptime and extensive customer support.

When comparing Web.com and WebHostingPad, Web.com stands out with a guaranteed uptime of 99.9%. The actual uptime recorded is an impressive 99.83% over a month, despite some downtime instances. Users benefit from unmetered bandwidth, SSL security, and nightly backups. These features ensure that websites hosted with Web.com remain accessible and secure.

WebHostingPad offers a similar 99.9% uptime guarantee but with notable exclusions. While WebHostingPad provides uptime guarantees, external factors like DDoS attacks or internet service issues are not covered. Web.com’s 24/7 monitoring and extensive customer support offer an edge in terms of reliability and user experience. Additionally, Web.com’s performance rated at 95% by GTmetrix further highlights its hosting efficiency.

🏆 Winner
Web.com: providing high-performance hosting solutions for small businesses and entrepreneurs.

When it comes to general performance, Web.com showcases faster hosting speeds, largely due to its server response times being 70% quicker. This is complemented by an improved storage system and important upgrades such as PHP 8.0, MySQL 8, and OPcode Cache. WebHostingPad, on the other hand, starts at a budget-friendly price with unlimited websites and domains. Though both providers promise a 99.9% uptime guarantee, Web.com’s enhancements in performance metrics give it a significant edge. WebHostingPad’s plans come with additional perks like free SSL, SiteLock Lite, and a 1-click WordPress install, but their hardware specifications and server optimizations aren’t as comprehensively detailed as those of Web.com.

Website Speed

Web.com stands out with its significant upgrades and caching mechanisms. The transition to PHP 8.0 and OPcode Cache ensures faster content retrieval and display, while MySQL 8 offers improved database interactions. These upgrades facilitate quicker navigation within WP-Admin, bolstered user satisfaction, and better SEO rankings due to reduced waiting times. WebHostingPad provides optimized high-power servers for their premium plans. However, without specific details on server response times or the exact nature of optimizations, it’s unclear if they reach the same level of performance enhancement offered by Web.com.

Scalability

In terms of scalability, Web.com supports over 99.5% of customers’ bandwidth needs and offers scalable solutions for those outgrowing shared architecture. However, details on whether scaling is automatic or requires manual upgrades aren’t provided. WebHostingPad’s plans are designed for growth, from startups to established websites, but like Web.com, specifics about elasticity and dedicated servers are not mentioned. Both options seem to offer solutions as businesses expand, although exact mechanisms and costs associated with scaling aren’t detailed for either host.

Winner Web.com: Offering robust and diverse security measures for various types of websites.

Technical security measures:

Both Web.com and WebHostingPad take significant steps to ensure the technical security of hosted websites. Web.com provides a range of SSL certificates, from Essential to Unified Communications Certificates (UCC), catering to different levels of security needs. It also features PHP 8.0 and MySQL 8 for optimized performance and security. WebHostingPad offers free SSL Certificates with all plans and commercial certificates for purchase, albeit without specified PHP versions. Web.com’s OPcode Cache and other features like SiteLock and CodeGuard enhance website performance and security, distinguishing it from WebHostingPad’s essential malware protection and server security measures.

Operational security measures:

Web.com emphasizes its operational security through SiteLock’s malware scanning and removal, CDN for faster site loading, and regular automated WordPress updates. It further ensures data safety with a 99.9% uptime guarantee and unmetered bandwidth. WebHostingPad provides similar operational measures, including free malware scans on WordPress plans, server security configurations, and automatic backups. Their additional security features include spam filtering and SiteLock Lite. While both are comprehensive in their respective security solutions, Web.com offers more advanced features like the SiteLock CDN, giving it an edge in operational security.

Compliance and certifications:

Both providers are GDPR-compliant, reassuring customers about data protection. Web.com explicitly confirms PCI compliance with SiteLock scanning, whereas WebHostingPad emphasizes the importance but doesn’t specify their own PCI compliance details. Neither service specifies HIPAA compliance.

🏆 Winner WebHostingPad: Offering unlimited resources and extensive features, including free eCommerce tools.

Web.com and WebHostingPad both provide comprehensive hosting solutions, yet they cater to slightly different needs. Web.com offers a website builder with a drag-and-drop interface, making it particularly user-friendly for those new to website creation. Additionally, their plans come with a free domain and SSL certificate for the first year, along with a guaranteed 99.9% uptime. This makes it a reliable option for small to medium-sized businesses. However, some high-demand features like the number of websites and FTP accounts vary depending on the plan. Web.com also includes business email hosting and supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for various development needs.

WebHostingPad, on the other hand, provides unlimited hosting space, bandwidth, MySQL databases, and domains, even on their basic plans. They also feature a free Weebly site builder, which is slightly easier to use for complex customizations compared to traditional drag-and-drop builders. Their hosting packages come with a free domain registration for one year, free SSL, and SiteLock Lite for security. The availability of multiple eCommerce storefronts at no additional cost is another significant advantage. However, specific details like the precise offerings of SSH and certain support metrics are less explicit, so direct inquiries might be necessary for these aspects.

Both providers support a range of users from beginners to experts with user-friendly website builders and WordPress staging areas. However, in terms of developer tools, both Web.com and WebHostingPad offer robust options including SSH access, support for multiple programming languages, and Git for version control, thus appealing to developers looking for advanced capabilities.

Email services:

Web.com provides business email hosting, including a professional email and support for multiple programming languages. In contrast, WebHostingPad offers unlimited email accounts, email forwarders, and webmail access. They also provide support for popular email protocols like POP3 and IMAP, which can be beneficial for comprehensive email campaigns. While Web.com does not explicitly state capabilities for reselling third-party services, WebHostingPad’s extensive email features allow for more robust and adaptable email management.

🏆 Winner Web.com: Offering a comprehensive range of features across its hosting plans for both shared hosting and WordPress hosting, it’s a solid choice for diverse web hosting needs.

Evaluating the pricing of plans among various hosting providers can be complex due to their differing pricing and renewal strategies. Additionally, certain plans require annual commitments, which adds to the difficulty of making comparisons. The prices listed are based on monthly commitments; plans requiring annual commitments are indicated. Additionally, although some providers offer identical plans for WordPress and shared hosting, we have created separate tables for each to enhance clarity.

Web.com and WebHostingPad offer competitive plans for both WordPress and shared hosting. Web.com has higher initial costs but matches the renewal prices of WebHostingPad in many areas, such as their Basic and Premium offerings. WebHostingPad features unlimited websites in its lower-tier plans, which might appeal to users with multiple domains. Both providers include free SSL certificates, but WebHostingPad offers extras like SiteLock Lite. However, Web.com includes business email accounts across all plans and offers a drag-and-drop website builder, enhancing its value. Here are the detailed comparisons of their offerings:

Enterprise plans

For enterprises looking for an extensive and scalable solution, Web.com and WebHostingPad both have substantial offerings. Web.com’s Premium Plans in both shared and WordPress hosting deliver ample storage and a considerable number of supported websites and visitors, ideal for expanding businesses. WebHostingPad offers an attractive VPLS Hosting plan for $19.95/month, which includes managed hosting and dedicated IP addresses, catering well to larger operations requiring dedicated resources and heightened control. Each provider ensures key features like SSL certificates and domain privacy to foster a secure and reliable hosting environment.

🏆 Winner
Web.com: Provides user-friendly tools and a streamlined setup experience.

Web.com and WebHostingPad differ in their admin panel offerings, impacting user experience. Web.com features user-friendly control panels that allow effortless management of domains, email accounts, and website performance. This centralized dashboard is designed for both technical and non-technical users, making it accessible and simple to navigate. The addition of a drag-and-drop website builder further simplifies the process of website creation, making it ideal for users with limited technical expertise. The interface is intuitive, ensuring a smooth setup process.

WebHostingPad also aims to cater to a broad range of users with its admin panel interface. They offer three free website builders: WordPress, Weebly, and RVSiteBuilder, each tailored to different levels of technical ability. The control panel is straightforward and integrates various tools for managing website functions. Additionally, the wide range of included site builders means that users can choose the tool they find easiest to use, making the setup accessible regardless of technical proficiency. Both hosting providers place a high emphasis on user accessibility, but Web.com takes the lead with its more integrated and centralized approach.

Web.com does not offer specific migration tools, but the presence of 24/7 product support can assist users in transferring their websites. Conversely, WebHostingPad’s support for migration is limited, typically requiring users to handle the process manually or seek professional assistance. Neither provider offers automated migration tools as a free service, and costs may be incurred if external assistance is needed. Thus, manual effort is generally required for site migration on both platforms.

Both hosting providers offer a wealth of help center resources and knowledge base articles designed to aid users in setup and troubleshooting. Web.com’s help center includes articles, step-by-step guides, and 24/7 support across multiple channels, ensuring users can resolve issues quickly. WebHostingPad similarly provides a comprehensive knowledgebase with articles covering various topics and 24/7 tech support. Both aim to equip users with the necessary resources to manage and troubleshoot their websites.

🏆 Winner
Web.com: A solid hosting provider with comprehensive user management features.

Web.com outshines Webhostingpad in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility. Web.com offers a structured process to add and edit account contacts, allowing users to invite others and designate their roles precisely. The two available roles, Administrative and Technical, cater well to varied needs, providing flexibility in access control. Unfortunately, Webhostingpad lacks any significant information regarding user roles or permissions, severely limiting its appeal in this regard.

Web.com provides detailed and user-friendly interfaces for managing users. The navigation is intuitive, relying on clearly labeled icons and tabs such as the user icon and Accounts & Users section. Each step, from adding users to updating permissions and billing information, is straightforward and well-documented, making it easy even for less tech-savvy users. Webhostingpad, on the other hand, does not offer comparable user interface details, making it less favorable for user management.

Web.com’s access control measures are effective and scalable. Users can clearly see all contacts and their respective access levels, ensuring a transparent management system. The platform supports growing user bases by offering easy methods to invite, update, and manage multiple accounts and contacts efficiently. Without any user management details, Webhostingpad cannot match Web.com’s capability to handle a diverse and expanding user base.

Web.com user roles table:

🏆 Winner Web.com: Excellent customer support avenues with extensive coverage and ease of access.

Web.com offers greater flexibility in customer support with various contact methods, such as phone, email, live chat, and a ticket system, all available 24/7. Their online help center with a knowledge base and immediate live chat assistance further enhance accessibility and problem resolution.

WebHostingPad also provides multiple customer support channels, including phone support, ticket submission, email, and live chat. While their technical support is available 24/7, phone support is limited to working days from 8 AM to 10 PM (CST). Their additional support via social media and a detailed knowledge base makes them a reliable choice, though slightly less accessible than Web.com.

Web.com vs Web Hosting Pad: User feedback

Overall, users appreciate the hosting provider for its comprehensive service that includes domain purchasing, website hosting, and development, making it a convenient one-stop solution. However, there are concerns about limitations on hosting unlimited domains, which can be a significant drawback for users managing numerous websites. Additionally, the cost of individual website software is considered prohibitive by some, especially for those who already have lifetime licenses for third-party software. Despite these issues, the service is generally seen as satisfactory.

WebHostingPad receives high praise for its affordability, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive customer support. Users particularly appreciate the low costs, free domain, and SSL certificate offerings, making it a budget-friendly option with reliable uptime. However, some areas for improvement include occasional downtime, inconsistent billing practices, and a somewhat limited feature set for larger businesses. Overall, it is highly recommended for those starting out or looking for a cost-effective hosting solution with responsive support.

Web.com vs Web Hosting Pad: FAQ