Final verdict
Siter.io vs Pixpa: Both platforms offer unique strengths, but Pixpa generally provides a more comprehensive solution for creatives and small businesses.
-
Siter.io (Overall Grade: 5.1/10)
is designed to simplify website creation with its drag-and-drop interface and freehand design tool. It excels in design functionalities, especially with its built-in Figma plugin, making it ideal for users who prioritize design flexibility. However, its ecommerce capabilities and integration options are limited, making it less suitable for users who need robust ecommerce features. Siter.io is best for designers and small business owners looking for an easy-to-use platform to create visually appealing websites. -
Pixpa (Overall Grade: 6.7/10)
offers a more rounded solution with its all-in-one platform for creating professional websites, online stores, blogs, and client galleries. It provides a wide variety of customizable templates, comprehensive ecommerce features, and strong marketing tools. Pixpa’s user-friendly interface and extensive learning resources make it accessible to users without coding knowledge. It is best suited for creatives and small businesses looking for a versatile platform to grow their online presence.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Design functionalities & templates |
7.5 |
7.8 |
Ease of use |
8.3 |
8.4 |
Ecommerce |
3.4 |
7.0 |
Website Editors |
7.8 |
7.5 |
Product testing options |
8.2 |
8.5 |
Price |
8.1 |
9.1 |
Hosting quality |
3.9 |
5.4 |
Website speed optimization |
1.5 |
3.0 |
Plugins and integrations |
5.5 |
6.7 |
Marketing features |
2.6 |
7.4 |
Customer support |
4.1 |
7.0 |
Security |
6.8 |
8.3 |
AI capabilities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
User Management |
7.1 |
7.3 |
Best for ecommerce
Verdict
: Pixpa is the superior choice for ecommerce, offering a more comprehensive set of features tailored for online stores, while Siter.io is better suited for design-focused websites with basic ecommerce needs.
-
Siter.io
: Siter.io provides basic ecommerce functionalities such as a shopping cart and checkout options. It excels in design flexibility, thanks to its drag-and-drop interface and Figma integration. However, its ecommerce capabilities are limited, making it less ideal for businesses looking to scale their online stores. Siter.io’s ecommerce score is 3.4. -
Pixpa
: Pixpa stands out with its robust ecommerce features, including secure payments, comprehensive product options, and a variety of ecommerce-specific templates. It supports multiple payment gateways and does not charge commissions on sales, making it a cost-effective solution for small businesses and creatives. Pixpa’s ecommerce score is 7.0.
Best for informational & business websites
Verdict
: Pixpa is the better choice for informational and business websites, offering a more comprehensive set of features and higher customization flexibility compared to Siter.io.
-
Siter.io
: Siter.io is a solid option for users looking to create professional-looking websites without coding knowledge. Its drag-and-drop interface and unique freehand design tool make it easy to customize sites. However, its limited number of templates and integrations may not be sufficient for more complex informational websites. Siter.io scored 7.2 in this category. -
Pixpa
: Pixpa excels in providing a wide variety of customizable templates and a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for creatives and small businesses. It offers built-in tools for SEO, marketing, and analytics, which are essential for growing an online presence. Pixpa’s comprehensive suite of learning resources and superior hosting quality further enhance its appeal for informational websites. Pixpa scored 7.9 in this category.
Detailed comparison
Design functionalities & templates
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
🏆
Winner: Pixpa.
Pixpa offers a wider variety of templates and designs, more customization flexibility, and more creative design possibilities.
Siter.io includes a handful of customizable templates for various website types, such as landing pages, portfolios, and e-commerce sites, ensuring users can start with a solid foundation and tailor each site to their needs. However, the limited number of templates is compensated with a UI which is very similar to design tools like Figma and AdobeXD. Additionally Siter.io has built in Figma plugin, which helps to export Figma designs directly to Siter.io platform, and make changes and tweaks right on Siter.io.
On the other hand, Pixpa offers a wide variety of templates and designs tailored to meet the diverse needs of creative professionals. With an extensive library that includes numerous options, users can easily find the perfect template that aligns with their brand identity and showcases their work in the best light. From sleek, minimalist designs to more complex and dynamic layouts, Pixpa ensures that there is something for everyone, regardless of their style or industry.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
Ease of use
Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:
- Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
- Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
- User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
- Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
🏆 Winner: Pixpa
. With a score of 8.4, Pixpa slightly edges out Siter.io, which scored 8.3. Both platforms are praised for their user-friendly interfaces and drag-and-drop functionality, making them accessible to users without coding knowledge. However, Pixpa’s focus on design aesthetics and its comprehensive suite of learning resources give it a slight advantage.
Learning Resources
🏆 Winner: Pixpa
. Both platforms offer a range of learning resources and tutorials, but Pixpa’s comprehensive suite of learning resources, including detailed tutorials, step-by-step guides, and video walkthroughs, give it the edge.
For ecommerce
EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:
- Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
- Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
- Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
- Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
- Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
When it comes to ecommerce, Pixpa has a clear advantage over Siter.io. While Siter.io does offer basic ecommerce features, it is primarily focused on its UI design capabilities. On the other hand, Pixpa offers a range of ecommerce features tailored for creatives and small business owners, including an integrated shopping cart, inventory tracking, and the ability to sell both physical and digital products.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Ecommerce themes and templates |
4.5 |
6.8 |
Product page customization |
6.5 |
6.5 |
Payment processing and commissions |
3.0 |
7.5 |
POS capabilities |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Payment gateways |
3.5 |
7.0 |
Product numbers |
2.5 |
5.5 |
Additional ecommerce features |
3.0 |
6.0 |
Siter.io ecommerce features:
- Shopping cart
- Checkout
- Purchase button
Pixpa ecommerce features:
- SEO and Marketing features
- Secure Payments
- Comprehensive product options
Ecommerce themes & templates
Siter.io has only a few ecommerce specific templates, however its built in Figma integration enables the use of a variety of third-party website templates designed in Figma to create a fully functional website directly on the platform. Pixpa, on the other hand, offers a variety of ecommerce-specific templates designed to cater to online stores and businesses. These templates are crafted to showcase products effectively, integrate shopping carts, and provide a seamless checkout experience.
Product page customization
Siter.io prioritizes its design capabilities, offering a wide range of customization options that are only limited by the user’s skill level. Pixpa offers a range of ecommerce product page customization options to cater to various needs. Users can easily manage and display products with options for multiple images, pricing variations, and detailed product descriptions. The platform allows for the customization of layout and design elements, including colors, fonts, and the overall aesthetic to match the brand identity.
Payment processing
Siter.io primarily serves as a website design tool rather than a dedicated ecommerce platform. While it does allow for the creation of ecommerce websites, its functionality for integrating payment gateways is quite limited. However, it’s important to note that the platform does support custom code injection, enabling users to integrate third-party payment widgets like PayPal or Stripe. Pixpa does not charge commissions on sales, allowing creators to keep all revenue generated, minus any transaction fees from payment processors. The platform supports various payment gateways, including Stripe, PayPal, Razorpay, PayUmoney, and offline payments, to facilitate direct payments into user accounts. However, Pixpa does not have any POS capabilities.
Website Editors
Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:
- Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
- Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
- Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
- Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
🏆
Winner: Siter.io
. Siter.io, with a score of 7.8, is designed to empower users with the ability to create websites seamlessly without any coding skills. It features an intuitive interface, real-time collaboration, and Figma integration, enhancing productivity and creativity for designers and teams. The editor supports inserting custom code for additional functionality, accessing thousands of free icons, and integrating with Unsplash for high-quality, royalty-free photos.
Pixpa’s editor, scoring 7.5, is designed for creative professionals to build their own websites without needing any coding knowledge. It offers a drag-and-drop interface that makes it easy to create and customize a professional-looking website, portfolio, or e-commerce store. Pixpa provides a variety of templates and design options tailored to photographers, artists, designers, and small businesses. Additionally, it includes features such as client galleries, blogging, and SEO tools to help users showcase their work effectively and grow their online presence.
Mobile editor/app
🏆
Winner: Pixpa
. Neither Siter.io nor Pixpa offer a dedicated mobile editor app. However, Pixpa allows users to edit their website on a mobile browser, albeit with some limitations. This gives Pixpa an edge over Siter.io in terms of mobile editing capabilities.
Siter.io does not provide any mobile editing capabilities, which can be a significant drawback for users who prefer to make changes to their website on the go.
In summary, Pixpa receives a higher rating due to its mobile browser editing capabilities, while Siter.io lacks in this area and may be a disadvantage for users who prefer to edit their website on the go.
Product testing options
Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:
- Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
- Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
- Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
- Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
Overall Result
:
Pixpa Wins
. Pixpa scores 8.5, slightly higher than Siter.io’s 8.2. Pixpa offers a 15-day free trial and a 30-day money-back guarantee, during which all premium features can be tested. Siter.io, on the other hand, offers a free plan that allows testing of all premium features, but does not offer a trial version or a money-back guarantee.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Free Plan |
Yes |
No |
Trial Duration |
No |
15 days |
Testing Premium Features |
All features with free plan |
All features during 15-day free trial |
Money Back Guarantee |
No |
30-day money back guarantee |
Price
PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:
- Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
- Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
- Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
- Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
Pixpa offers a higher value for the price, as reflected in its higher price score of 9.1 compared to Siter.io’s 8.1.
Both platforms offer a range of pricing plans to suit different needs, and significant discounts for annual subscriptions. However, neither platform offers an enterprise plan.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Free |
Start (Free/month): Includes unlimited teammates, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites are free, and SEO and page speed features are not included. Additionally, it’s not possible to publish any of the websites with the free plan. |
No offering at this amount. |
$0-$10 |
Solo ($8/month): For 1 website and includes 2 editors, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $4 each. Value for price: 6.0 |
Basic ($8/month): Ideal for personal use with basic website features, gallery images, and blogging. Possible to have up to 10 website pages and up to 200 images. Value for price: 6.0 |
$10-$20 |
Plus ($14/month): Offers 3 websites with 4 editors, up to 50 pages, 5 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $6 each. Value for price: 7.5 |
Creator ($15/month): Targets creators with more storage and enhanced visibility options. Value for price: 7.0 |
$15-$20 |
No offering at this amount. |
Professional ($20/month): For professionals needing ecommerce enhancements and larger storage. Value for price: 8.0 |
$20+ |
Pro ($29/month): Provides 5 websites, 6 editors, unlimited pages, unlimited forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites cost $8 each. Value for price: 8.5 |
Advanced ($25/month): Best for businesses requiring extensive resources and advanced ecommerce tools. Value for Price: 9.0 |
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.
Hosting quality
Hosting
qualityExamines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:
- Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
- Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
- Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
- Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
🏆
Winner: Pixpa
Pixpa’s managed cloud hosting, powered by Amazon Web Services, offers scalable and reliable hosting with varying levels of storage and unlimited bandwidth. Siter.io, on the other hand, provides cloud-based hosting but lacks transparency about its bandwidth, storage limitations, and data center locations. Pixpa’s superior hosting features and transparency earn it a higher rating.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Do they offer hosting? |
Yes, with limited information on bandwidth and storage limitations |
Yes, with scalable and reliable cloud hosting, varying levels of storage, and unlimited bandwidth |
Data Centers: |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Type of hosting: |
Cloud based hosting |
Managed Cloud Hosting |
Uptime: |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Uptime Guarantee: |
No |
No |
Website Speed Optimization
Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:
- PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
- Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
- Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
- Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
- CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
🏆 Winner: Pixpa
Both Siter.io and Pixpa prioritize website performance and speed, but Pixpa’s more comprehensive approach to speed optimization gives it the edge.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Focus |
Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization |
Code Minification, CDN, HTML caching, Server Side Rendering, SEO optimization |
Performance Tools |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Key Strategies |
Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization |
Code Minification, CDN, HTML caching, Server Side Rendering, SEO optimization |
Load Times |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Page Speed Scores Range |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Core Web Vitals Improvement |
Not disclosed |
Emphasis on LCP, FID, CLS improvements |
Pixpa’s approach to website speed optimization includes code minification, use of a content delivery network (CDN), HTML caching, server-side rendering, and SEO optimization. These strategies aim to improve the speed and performance of websites built with Pixpa. While specific data on load times and PageSpeed scores is not provided, Pixpa does emphasize improvements in Core Web Vitals, which are key metrics for user experience on the web.
Siter.io, on the other hand, focuses on mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization for speed improvement. However, it does not disclose any specific information about load times, PageSpeed scores, or improvements in Core Web Vitals. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of Siter.io’s speed optimization strategies.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
Plugins and integrations
Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:
- Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
- Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
- Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
- Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
🏆 Winner: Pixpa.
Pixpa scores 6.7, offering over 100 plugins (or apps, as they call them) to enhance website functionality, including SEO tools, e-commerce solutions, and social media integrations. Some of these plugins may come with additional costs, but they provide advanced features and integrations that are not available with the base features. Siter.io, scoring 5.5, offers limited integrations, primarily focusing on its design capabilities. However, it does support custom code injection, allowing users to incorporate third-party plugins as needed.
Marketing Features
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
🏆
Overall Winner: Pixpa
. Pixpa stands out for its comprehensive marketing tools, including SEO, email marketing, blogging, social media integration, analytics and reporting, and ads and promotions. Siter.io, while offering some of these features, lacks in email marketing and social media integration.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
SEO Tools |
Basic SEO features | Comprehensive SEO tools |
Email Marketing |
|
|
Blogging |
Possible to design a simple blog | Comprehensive blogging features |
Social Media Integration |
|
Integrated social media buttons and features |
Analytics and Reporting |
Google analytics integration | Comprehensive analytics with Google Analytics integration |
Ads and Promotions |
Facebook Pixel integration | SEO, social media integration, email marketing, and promotional discounts |
Customer Support
Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:
- Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
- Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
- Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
- Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
🏆 Winner: Pixpa
. In the comparison of Siter.io vs Pixpa, Pixpa takes the lead with a customer support score of 7.0. Pixpa offers 24/7 customer support through email and live chat, ensuring users can get help whenever they need it. This round-the-clock availability is a significant advantage for users who may encounter issues at any time.
On the other hand, Siter.io has a customer support score of 4.1 and primarily relies on its help center and articles for assistance. While email support is available, the lack of specified support hours can be a drawback for users needing timely help. This makes Pixpa the more reliable option for customer support between the two platforms.
Security
SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:
- Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
- SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
- Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
- Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
🏆
Winner: Pixpa
. Pixpa’s commitment to security is evident in its robust measures, including SSL encryption, regular backups, compliance with data protection regulations, and secure hosting with firewalls and DDoS protection. These features ensure the safety and integrity of user data and provide a secure environment for building and managing websites.
Although Siter.io also prioritizes user privacy and employs a zero-knowledge storage system, ensuring data is encrypted both in storage and during transfer. However, it does not disclose detailed information about its website security measures, which makes Pixpa a more reliable choice in terms of security.
AI Capabilities
AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:
- Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
- Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
- AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
- Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Personalized Design |
|
|
SEO Optimization |
|
|
Customer Behavior Analysis |
|
|
Sales Predictions |
|
|
Inventory Management |
|
|
Content Generation |
|
|
🏆 Winner: None
. Both Siter.io and Pixpa do not offer any AI capabilities. Therefore, if you are looking for a website builder with AI features, neither of these platforms would be suitable. They both scored 0.0 in AI capabilities.
User Management
User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:
- Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
permissions. - Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
- Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
levels. - Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
🏆 Winner: Pixpa
. Both Siter.io and Pixpa offer user management features, but they approach this aspect differently.
- Siter.io focuses on its real-time collaborative features, offering varying numbers of editors depending on the plan. Each plan provides access for 2 to 6 editors who can edit and design websites, with the option to include additional editors for an extra fee.
- Pixpa offers a Users and Permissions feature allowing multiple users on Professional plans (up to 5 users) and Advanced plans (unlimited). The site owner can grant edit access to sections like General, Store, Client Galleries, Marketing, Settings, and Administration, customizing permissions based on user roles. The site owner can manage user permissions, suspend or reactivate users, and permanently remove them, but irreversible actions should be approached with caution.
Given the scores, Pixpa (7.3) slightly outperforms Siter.io (7.1) in user management.
Additional Features
|
|
|
---|---|---|
SSL Certificate |
|
|
Custom Domain |
|
|
Free Custom Domain Included |
|
|
International Domains |
|
|
Mobile Responsive |
|
|
Page Speed |
|
|
Website Builder Mobile App |
|
|
Convert a Website To An App |
|
|
Website Analytics |
|
|
Multilingual Sites |
|
|
Multiple Users |
|
|
User Feedback
Overall, users appreciate Siter.io for its user-friendly interface and robust features, such as the drag-and-drop editor and customizable templates, making website building accessible to teams without coding expertise. However, there’s a consensus that the platform could improve its integration options to enhance workflow efficiency further. Nevertheless, Siter.io effectively addresses the challenge of website creation without coding skills, benefiting designers, small business owners, and individuals seeking to establish an online presence or portfolio quickly and efficiently.
Pixpa stands out for its exceptional customer service, easy-to-use interface, and affordable pricing. Users appreciate the variety of templates and customization options available, allowing them to create professional-looking websites tailored to their needs. The responsive and helpful customer support, coupled with the platform’s features like online forms and integrations, make Pixpa a valuable tool for individuals and businesses seeking to establish a strong online presence. Despite some minor issues like limited options for third-party integrations and mobile layout adjustments, Pixpa remains highly recommended for its versatility, professionalism, and overall value.
The making of this blog
We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.
FAQ
Which platform is better for ecommerce, Siter.io or Pixpa?
How do Siter.io and Pixpa compare in terms of design functionalities and templates?
Which platform offers better customer support, Siter.io or Pixpa?
Can I manage multiple users on both Siter.io and Pixpa?
Are there any AI capabilities in Siter.io or Pixpa?
How do the platforms perform in terms of website speed optimization?
What are the main differences in pricing between Siter.io and Pixpa?