Final verdict
Siter.io and Format offer unique strengths tailored to different user needs, with Format slightly leading in overall score.
-
Siter.io (Overall Grade: 5.1/10)
excels in design functionalities and website editors, making it a strong choice for users who prioritize creative control and collaboration. Its unique Figma integration and freehand design tool cater to designers seeking a seamless transition from design to website creation. However, its ecommerce capabilities and customer support are areas where it falls short, limiting its appeal for users looking for a comprehensive ecommerce solution or extensive support. -
Format (Overall Grade: 5.8/10)
stands out for its focus on creative professionals, offering a range of customizable templates and features like client proofing and blogging tools that are tailored to showcase portfolios. It scores higher in hosting quality, website speed optimization, marketing features, and customer support, making it a more rounded option for creatives looking to share their work and connect with potential clients. Despite its limitations in design flexibility compared to Siter.io, Format’s user-friendly approach and specialized features make it a compelling choice for photographers, artists, and designers.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Design functionalities & templates |
7.5 |
7.0 |
|
Ease of use |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
Ecommerce |
3.4 |
5.2 |
|
Website Editors |
7.8 |
7.5 |
|
Product testing options |
8.2 |
8.3 |
|
Price |
8.1 |
7.9 |
|
Hosting quality |
3.9 |
5.0 |
|
Website speed optimization |
1.5 |
5.0 |
|
Plugins and integrations |
5.5 |
4.9 |
|
Marketing features |
2.6 |
5.3 |
|
Customer support |
4.1 |
7.0 |
|
Security |
6.8 |
7.4 |
|
AI capabilities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
User Management |
7.1 |
2.8 |
| Overall |
5.1 |
5.8 |
Best for ecommerce
3.4
5.2
Verdict
: While both Siter.io and Format offer basic ecommerce functionalities, Format edges out with a slightly better score and a focus on creatives looking to sell online.
-
Siter.io
: Offers a unique design experience with its freehand design tool and Figma integration, making it suitable for those prioritizing design over advanced ecommerce features. Its ecommerce capabilities are basic, focusing on simple product sales. -
Format
: Tailored for creative professionals, Format provides essential ecommerce features with a stronger emphasis on product presentation and marketing. It’s better suited for artists and photographers who need to sell their work online but don’t require complex ecommerce solutions.
Best for informational & business websites
7.2
7.2
Verdict
: With identical scores for informational and business websites, both Siter.io and Format offer unique strengths for creating professional websites. The choice between them depends on specific user needs and preferences.
-
Siter.io
: Tailored for users seeking a blend of design flexibility and ease of use, Siter.io stands out with its drag-and-drop interface and unique freehand design tool. It’s particularly appealing for those who value the ability to import designs from Figma directly, making it a solid choice for businesses looking for a customizable and straightforward platform. -
Format
: Designed with creative professionals in mind, Format excels in showcasing portfolios through its visually appealing templates and intuitive drag-and-drop interface. It offers specialized features like client proofing and an integrated online store, making it ideal for artists, photographers, and designers who want to display their work and engage with clients online.
Detailed comparison
Design functionalities & templates
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
7.5
7.0
🏆
Winner: Siter.io.
If you’re looking for a platform that offers more creative control and a wide array of design features, Siter.io is the preferred choice.
Siter.io includes a handful of customizable templates for various website types, such as landing pages, portfolios, and e-commerce sites, ensuring users can start with a solid foundation and tailor each site to their needs. However, the limited number of templates is compensated with a UI which is very similar to design tools like Figma and AdobeXD. Additionally Siter.io has built in Figma plugin, which helps to export Figma designs directly to Siter.io platform, and make changes and tweaks right on Siter.io.
Compared to Siter.io, Format is a website builder specifically designed for creatives, offering nearly 100 customizable templates tailored for various artistic disciplines. It emphasizes high-quality imagery and mobile-friendly designs, ensuring portfolios look professional on any device. While it offers easy-to-use features and e-commerce tools for selling work directly, some users find its interface less intuitive and its feature set somewhat limited for broader website needs.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
No credit card required
Ease of use
Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:
- Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
- Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
- User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
- Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.3
8.3
🏆 Winner: Tie
. Both Siter.io and Format score an 8.3 in ease of use, indicating that they are equally user-friendly. Siter.io stands out with its unique feature of importing designs from Figma, which can be a significant advantage for users who want to leverage third-party templates. On the other hand, Format is specifically designed for creative professionals and offers a range of customizable templates tailored for showcasing portfolios.
Learning Resources
🏆 Winner: Tie
. Both Siter.io and Format offer learning resources and tutorials to help users navigate their platforms. However, neither platform has a substantial community of users, which can be a valuable resource for learning and troubleshooting.
For ecommerce
EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:
- Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
- Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
- Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
- Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
- Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
3.4
5.2
When it comes to ecommerce, both Siter.io and Format offer basic functionalities. Siter.io, primarily a UI design tool, has limited ecommerce features but allows for the creation of ecommerce websites. Its functionality for integrating payment gateways is quite limited, but it does support custom code injection, enabling users to integrate third-party payment widgets like PayPal or Stripe.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ecommerce themes and templates |
4.5 |
4.0 |
|
Product page customization |
6.5 |
5.5 |
|
Payment processing and commissions |
3.0 |
4.5 |
|
POS capabilities |
2.0 |
0.0 |
|
Payment gateways |
3.5 |
6.5 |
|
Product numbers |
2.5 |
5.0 |
|
Additional ecommerce features |
3.0 |
3.5 |
Siter.io ecommerce features:
- Shopping cart
- Checkout
- Purchase button
Format, on the other hand, caters specifically to creatives and photographers, offering basic ecommerce functionalities for selling physical and digital products. It includes features such as product management, currency options, and discounts. However, its ecommerce capabilities are basic and may not suit those looking for extensive ecommerce features.
Format ecommerce features:
- Inventory management and tracking
- Discounts
- Multiple currency options
Ecommerce themes & templates
Siter.io has only a few ecommerce specific templates, however its built-in Figma integration enables the use of a variety of third-party website templates designed in Figma to create a fully functional website directly on the platform. Format, on the other hand, does not have ecommerce specific templates.
Product page customization
Siter.io prioritizes its design capabilities, offering a wide range of customization options that are only limited by the user’s skill level. Format offers limited specific details on product page customization directly, but its e-commerce features suggest a focus on showcasing products through high-quality imagery and detailed descriptions. You can manage product specifics like shipping, availability, and pricing, with customization likely extending to layout and presentation styles to highlight products effectively.
Payment processing
Siter.io primarily serves as a website design tool rather than a dedicated ecommerce platform. While it does allow for the creation of ecommerce websites, its functionality for integrating payment gateways is quite limited. However, it’s important to note that the platform does support custom code injection, enabling users to integrate third-party payment widgets like PayPal or Stripe.
The Format website builder offers integration with major payment gateways, including Paypal and Stripe. It charges a 15% commission on the Pro plan and 5% on the Pro Plus plan. However, the platform does not have built-in POS (Point of Sale) capabilities.
Website Editors
Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:
- Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
- Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
- Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
- Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.8
7.5
🏆
Winner: Siter.io
. Siter.io, with a score of 7.8, offers an editor designed to empower users with the ability to create websites seamlessly without any coding skills. It features an intuitive interface, real-time collaboration, and Figma integration, enhancing productivity and creativity for designers and teams. The editor supports inserting custom code for additional functionality, accessing thousands of free icons, and integrating with Unsplash for high-quality, royalty-free photos.
Format’s editor, scoring 7.5, offers a variety of features for creating online portfolios. It provides nearly 100 professionally designed templates and thousands of design variations without requiring any coding. Users can express creativity with custom pages, incorporating unique gallery layouts, colors, text formatting, and custom code embeds. The templates and pages are fully responsive, ensuring a mobile-first experience.
Mobile editor/app
0
4.0
🏆
Winner: Format
. Neither Siter.io nor Format offer a dedicated mobile editor app. However, Format allows users to edit their websites using a mobile browser, although the interface is the same as the desktop version, which can make it difficult to use on a smartphone. On the other hand, Siter.io does not provide any mobile editing capabilities.
Therefore, Format has a slight edge over Siter.io in terms of mobile editing, reflected in their respective mobile editor scores of 4.0 and 0.
Product testing options
Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:
- Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
- Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
- Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
- Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
8.2
8.3
Overall Result
:
Format wins
. Format scores slightly higher than Siter.io with 8.3 against 8.2 in product testing options. While Siter.io offers a free version with the possibility to test all premium features, it does not provide a trial version or a money-back guarantee. On the other hand, Format does not have a free version but offers a 14-day free trial during which users can test premium features. Additionally, Format provides a 30-day money-back guarantee, giving users more confidence in their purchase.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free Plan |
Yes |
No |
|
Trial Duration |
No |
14 days |
|
Testing Premium Features |
Yes (with free plan) |
Yes (during free trial) |
|
Money Back Guarantee |
No |
Yes (30 days) |
Price
PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:
- Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
- Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
- Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
- Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.1
7.9
Siter.io and Format offer competitive pricing, with Siter.io having a slightly higher price score. Both offer discounts for annual billing, but neither offer enterprise plans.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free |
Start (Free/month): Includes unlimited teammates, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites are free, and SEO and page speed features are not included. Additionally, it’s not possible to publish any of the websites with the free plan. |
No offering at this amount. |
|
$0-$10 |
Solo ($8/month): For 1 website and includes 2 editors, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $4 each. Value for price: 6.0 |
No offering at this amount. |
|
$10-$20 |
Plus ($14/month): Offers 3 websites with 4 editors, up to 50 pages, 5 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $6 each. Value for price: 7.5 |
Basic ($12.00/month): Offers core services like mobile-optimized site, up to 10 web pages, and up to 70 high-resolution images. 3 client galleries, up to 2GB file transfers. No video uploads or custom code editor. Value for price: 5.0 |
|
$20-$30 |
Pro ($29/month): Provides 5 websites, 6 editors, unlimited pages, unlimited forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites cost $8 each. Value for price: 8.5 |
Pro ($24.00/month): Includes all from Basic, plus unlimited web pages, 1500 high-resolution images,15 mins video hosting, 100GB cloud storage, a free custom domain, Online Store with up to 15 products, 50 client galleries and up to 5GB file transfers. Value for price: 7.5 |
|
$30+ |
No offering at this amount. |
Pro Plus ($36.00/month): Adds on Pro features with priority support, unlimited pages and high-res images, 120 mins video hosting, and 1TB cloud storage. Online Store with up to 1000 products, 250 client galleries and 10GB file transfers. Value for Price: 8.5 |
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.
Hosting quality
Hosting
qualityExamines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:
- Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
- Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
- Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
- Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
3.9
5.0
🏆
Winner: Format
Both Siter.io and Format offer hosting services, but neither provides detailed information about their hosting types, uptime, uptime guarantee, or data centers. However, Format scores slightly higher in hosting quality, possibly due to better overall performance or user experience.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Do they offer hosting? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Type of hosting: |
Cloud based hosting |
Not disclosed |
|
Uptime: |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
|
Uptime Guarantee: |
No |
No |
|
Data Centers: |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Website Speed Optimization
Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:
- PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
- Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
- Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
- Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
- CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
1.5
5.0
🏆 Winner: Format
Both Siter.io and Format prioritize website performance and page speed, but Format has a higher website speed optimization score and uses image and video optimization as a strategy for speed optimization.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Focus |
Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization |
Image and video optimization |
|
Performance Tools |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
|
Key Strategies |
Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization |
Image and video optimization |
|
Load Times |
Not disclosed |
Varies depending on optimization and website complexity |
|
Page Speed Scores Range |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
|
Core Web Vitals Improvement |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
Siter.io is a website builder designed to simplify the process of creating and managing websites. It offers a drag-and-drop interface and freehand design tool unique to Siter.io, making it easy for users without coding knowledge to design and customize their sites. Siter.io’s approach to enhancing site speed includes mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. However, Siter.io does not disclose specific information about its load times, PageSpeed scores, or Core Web Vital improvements.
Format is a website builder specifically designed for creative professionals such as photographers, artists, designers, and illustrators. It offers a range of customizable templates that are tailored to showcase portfolios in a visually appealing manner. Format’s strategy for speed optimization is image and video optimization. However, like Siter.io, Format does not disclose specific information about its load times, PageSpeed scores, or Core Web Vital improvements. Despite this, Format has a higher website speed optimization score, which gives it an edge over Siter.io.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
No credit card required
Plugins and integrations
Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:
- Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
- Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
- Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
- Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
5.5
4.9
🏆 Winner: Siter.io.
With a score of 5.5, Siter.io takes the lead over Format, which scores 4.9. Siter.io’s unique Figma integration allows users to import website designs directly into the platform, creating fully functional websites with ease. Although Format offers integrations with Adobe Lightroom, Mailchimp, and Google Analytics, its overall capabilities for expansion through plugins and integrations are notably limited. This makes Siter.io a more flexible option for users looking to extend their website’s functionality.
Marketing Features
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
2.6
5.3
🏆
Overall Winner: Format
. Format offers a more comprehensive set of marketing features, including email marketing and social media integration, which are not available in Siter.io. However, Siter.io excels in ads and promotions with its integration with Meta Pixel and Facebook App Ads.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
SEO Tools |
Basic SEO features | Basic SEO features |
|
Email Marketing |
✗ | ✓ |
|
Blogging |
Possible to design a simple blog | ✓ |
|
Social Media Integration |
✗ | Instagram integration |
|
Analytics and Reporting |
Google analytics integration | Google analytics integration |
|
Ads and Promotions |
Facebook Pixel integration | Basic promotional features |
Customer Support
Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:
- Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
- Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
- Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
- Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
4.1
7.0
🏆 Winner: Format
. Format outperforms Siter.io in this category with a customer support score of 7.0 compared to Siter.io’s 4.1. Format offers 24/7 customer support through email and live chat, ensuring that users can get help whenever they need it. The support team is distributed across different countries, which allows for round-the-clock availability.
On the other hand, Siter.io primarily assists customers through its help center and articles. While it does offer email support, the platform doesn’t specify the days or hours of operation for customer support. Furthermore, neither of the platforms offers specific support for enterprises.
Security
SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:
- Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
- SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
- Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
- Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
6.8
7.4
🏆
Winner: Format
. Format edges out Siter.io with a slightly higher security score. Both platforms prioritize user data protection and offer SSL security. However, Format provides more comprehensive security measures, including encrypted data storage, strict access controls, regular security updates, and compliance with data protection regulations.
Siter.io also prioritizes user privacy and employs a zero-knowledge storage system, but lacks detailed information about its website security measures.
AI Capabilities
AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:
- Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
- Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
- AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
- Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0.0
0.0
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Personalized Design |
|
|
|
SEO Optimization |
|
|
|
Customer Behavior Analysis |
|
|
|
Sales Predictions |
|
|
|
Inventory Management |
|
|
|
Content Generation |
|
|
🏆 Winner: None
. Both Siter.io and Format do not have any AI capabilities. Therefore, if you are looking for a website builder with AI features, neither of these options would be suitable. Both builders focus on providing an intuitive and user-friendly interface for website creation and management, without the use of AI.
User Management
User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:
- Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
permissions. - Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
- Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
levels. - Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.1
2.8
🏆 Winner: Siter.io
. Siter.io and Format have different approaches to user management.
- Siter.io focuses on its real-time collaborative features, offering varying numbers of editors depending on the plan. Each plan provides access for 2 to 6 editors who can edit and design websites, with the option to include additional editors for an extra fee.
- Format, on the other hand, allows only one user to manage and edit websites.
Unfortunately, neither platform provided detailed information about user roles and access levels.
Additional Features
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
SSL Certificate |
|
|
|
Custom Domain |
|
|
|
Free Custom Domain Included |
|
|
|
International Domains |
|
|
|
Mobile Responsive |
|
|
|
Page Speed |
|
|
|
Website Builder Mobile App |
|
|
|
Convert a Website To An App |
|
|
|
Website Analytics |
|
|
|
Multilingual Sites |
|
|
|
Multiple Users |
|
|
User Feedback
Siter.io is highly rated by users for its user-friendly interface and robust features, such as the drag-and-drop editor and customizable templates, which make website building accessible to teams without coding expertise. However, users suggest that the platform could improve its integration options to enhance workflow efficiency further. Despite this, Siter.io effectively addresses the challenge of website creation without coding skills, benefiting designers, small business owners, and individuals seeking to establish an online presence or portfolio quickly and efficiently.
Format, on the other hand, is praised for its user-friendly website builder, particularly the ease of adding images and the effectiveness of customer service. Users appreciate the variety of modern templates and the platform’s suitability for users without technical expertise, especially photographers. The mobile app and proofing section receive special mentions for their convenience and functionality. However, some users desire more customization options, particularly for mobile views, and mention minor limitations in template flexibility and SEO functionality. Despite these minor drawbacks, Format is celebrated for its ability to provide a professional online presence easily and efficiently, solving users’ needs for showcasing work and attracting new clients.
The making of this blog
We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.
FAQ
Which platform is better for creative professionals, Siter.io or Format?
Can I use Siter.io for ecommerce?
Which platform offers better customer support, Siter.io or Format?
How do Siter.io and Format compare in terms of design flexibility?
Which platform is more user-friendly for beginners?
Are there any AI capabilities in Siter.io or Format?
Which platform is better for hosting quality and website speed optimization?
Can I manage multiple users with Siter.io or Format?
Build a website with AI in one minute
Build a website with AI in one minute
Create your dream website with 10Web AI Builder and take your business online!
