Final verdict
Framer and Siter.io cater to different audiences with their unique sets of features, but overall, Framer takes the lead in this comparison.
-
Siter.io (Overall Grade: 5.1/10)
is praised for its user-friendly interface and unique design tools, such as the drag-and-drop editor and Figma plugin, making it a good choice for users without coding knowledge. It excels in ease of use and offers a straightforward approach to website building. However, it falls short in areas like ecommerce capabilities, hosting quality, website speed optimization, and advanced features compared to Framer. -
Framer (Overall Grade: 7.1/10)
stands out with its AI-driven design capabilities, extensive template library, and robust customization options. It offers a comprehensive solution for both novices and experienced designers, with a focus on interactive design and motion. Despite a steeper learning curve and the absence of native ecommerce features, Framer compensates with powerful integrations, superior hosting quality, and innovative AI features, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of web projects.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Design functionalities & templates |
7.5 |
8.5 |
| Ease of use |
8.3 |
7.1 |
| Ecommerce |
3.4 |
5.9 |
| Website editors |
7.8 |
7.6 |
| Product testing options |
8.2 |
6.2 |
| Price |
8.1 |
7.7 |
| Hosting quality |
3.9 |
7.1 |
| Website speed optimization |
1.5 |
7.4 |
| Plugins/extensions and integrations |
5.5 |
7.6 |
| Marketing features |
2.6 |
7.2 |
| Customer support |
4.1 |
5.6 |
| Website security |
6.8 |
8.2 |
| AI capabilities |
0.0 |
7.6 |
| User management |
7.1 |
7.4 |
Best for ecommerce
3.4
5.9
Verdict
: Framer takes the lead in ecommerce capabilities, offering more advanced features and integrations compared to Siter.io.
-
Siter.io
: While Siter.io provides basic ecommerce functionalities and excels in design flexibility with its unique freehand tool, it falls short in offering a comprehensive ecommerce solution. Its limited payment gateway integration and ecommerce features make it less suitable for businesses looking to scale. -
Framer
: Despite lacking native ecommerce features, Framer’s ability to integrate with powerful platforms like Ecwid and its support for Stripe payment processing make it a more versatile choice for ecommerce. Its range of customizable ecommerce templates and focus on design and user experience cater well to businesses aiming for a strong online presence.
Best for informational & business websites
7.2
7.5
Verdict
: Framer slightly edges out Siter.io for informational and business websites, thanks to its slightly higher score and robust design capabilities.
-
Siter.io
: Offers a unique freehand design tool and drag-and-drop interface, making it user-friendly for those without coding knowledge. While it provides a solid foundation for various website types, its focus on design tools like the built-in Figma plugin and SEO tools makes it a strong contender for creating professional-looking informational sites. -
Framer
: Stands out with its AI-driven design and extensive customization options, making it ideal for users seeking creative control and efficiency in website management. Despite a learning curve for beginners, its higher score and comprehensive component library offer a versatile platform for informational and business websites.
Detailed comparison
Design functionalities & templates
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
7.5
8.5
🏆
Winner: Framer.
If you’re looking for a platform that offers more creative control, a wide array of design features, and a larger number of templates, Framer is the preferred choice.
Siter.io includes a handful of customizable templates for various website types, such as landing pages, portfolios, and e-commerce sites, ensuring users can start with a solid foundation and tailor each site to their needs. However, the limited number of templates is compensated with a UI which is very similar to design tools like Figma and AdobeXD. Additionally Siter.io has built in Figma plugin, which helps to export Figma designs directly to Siter.io platform, and make changes and tweaks right on Siter.io.
Compared to Siter.io, Framer offers a diverse array of over 1,000 customizable website templates and designs, catering to various industries and project requirements. It stands out for its robust design and prototyping features, including responsive design capabilities, real-time collaboration, and extensive import options from other design tools. The platform facilitates a collaborative design process through features like multiplayer functionalities and real components for interactive design, making it an ideal choice for designers, developers, and teams.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
No credit card required
Ease of use
Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:
- Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
- Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
- User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
- Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.3
7.1
🏆 Winner: Siter.io
. With a score of 8.3, Siter.io is designed for ease of use, catering to both beginners and experienced designers with its intuitive interface and drag-and-drop functionality. Framer, scoring 7.1, is designed with a focus on interactive design and motion, which may present a learning curve for complete beginners. If ease of use is a priority, Siter.io is the clear winner in this category.
Learning Resources
🏆 Winner: Framer
. While both platforms offer solid learning resources, Framer goes a step further with its wide array of detailed courses and lessons on Framer Academy, making it easier for users to learn and adapt.
For ecommerce
EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:
- Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
- Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
- Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
- Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
- Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
3.4
5.9
When it comes to ecommerce, both Siter.io and Framer have their limitations. Siter.io, while offering a unique freehand design tool and a range of templates, has very basic ecommerce features. It’s possible to build an ecommerce store, but the features are limited. On the other hand, Framer does not offer native ecommerce features directly within its platform. However, it can be paired with Ecwid’s free shopping cart extension, which allows for quick and easy addition of online store functionalities to a Framer website.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ecommerce themes and templates |
4.5 |
7.0 |
|
Product page customization |
6.5 |
5.5 |
|
Payment processing and commissions |
3.0 |
6.5 |
|
POS capabilities |
2.0 |
3.0 |
|
Payment gateways |
3.5 |
6.0 |
|
Product numbers |
2.5 |
6.0 |
|
Additional ecommerce features |
3.0 |
5.5 |
Siter.io ecommerce features:
- Shopping cart
- Checkout
- Purchase button
Framer ecommerce features:
- Ecwid integration
Ecommerce themes & templates
Siter.io has only a few ecommerce specific templates, but its built-in Figma integration enables the use of a variety of third-party website templates designed in Figma to create a fully functional website directly on the platform. In contrast, Framer offers 97 website templates specifically designed for ecommerce, providing a wide range of options for various business needs. These templates are highly customizable, allowing for easy adjustments to colors, fonts, layouts, and integration with essential ecommerce tools.
Product page customization
Siter.io prioritizes its design capabilities, offering a wide range of customization options that are only limited by the user’s skill level. Framer, however, primarily focuses on expanding design possibilities for ecommerce. It lacks inherent ecommerce functionalities and instead heavily depends on integrating with platforms such as Shopify and Ecwid. While Framer allows for some customization of product pages, these modifications are generally limited to design and layout alterations.
Payment processing
Siter.io primarily serves as a website design tool rather than a dedicated ecommerce platform. While it does allow for the creation of ecommerce websites, its functionality for integrating payment gateways is quite limited. However, it does support custom code injection, enabling users to integrate third-party payment widgets like PayPal or Stripe. Framer supports Stripe for payment processing, enabling a wide range of payment options including one-time payments, subscriptions, and more, without requiring coding. While specific transaction fees were not mentioned, such fees typically depend on Stripe’s pricing. Framer’s focus is on online transactions and e-commerce integrations, and there’s no explicit mention of native POS functionality. For the most current details on fees and features, it’s recommended to consult directly with Framer or Stripe.
Website Editors
Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:
- Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
- Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
- Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
- Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.8
7.6
🏆
Winner: Siter.io
. Siter.io, with a score of 7.8, offers an editor designed to empower users with the ability to create websites seamlessly without any coding skills. It features an intuitive interface, real-time collaboration, and Figma integration, enhancing productivity and creativity for designers and teams. The editor supports inserting custom code for additional functionality, accessing thousands of free icons, and integrating with Unsplash for high-quality, royalty-free photos.
Framer’s editor, scoring 7.6, is designed for high-fidelity prototyping and complex animations, catering to both designers and developers. It offers a robust set of tools for creating interactive and responsive designs, including a wide array of pre-built components, real-time collaboration features, and the ability to integrate with other design tools and workflows. However, its advanced features and focus on high-fidelity prototypes may present a steep learning curve for beginners or those accustomed to more traditional, straightforward website builders.
Mobile editor/app
0
4.5
🏆
Winner: Framer
. Both Siter.io and Framer do not offer a dedicated mobile editor app. However, Framer allows users to modify their websites using a mobile browser, although this comes with certain restrictions and is notably inconvenient. On the other hand, Siter.io does not provide any mobile editing capabilities. Therefore, Framer has a slight edge over Siter.io in this category, despite the limitations.
Product testing options
Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:
- Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
- Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
- Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
- Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
8.2
6.2
Overall Result
:
Siter.io wins
. Siter.io scores 8.2, offering a free version that allows testing of all premium features. Framer, scoring 6.2, also provides a free version, but only some features can be tested. Framer offers a money-back guarantee in some regions, while Siter.io does not offer this.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free Plan |
Yes | Yes |
|
Trial Duration |
No | No |
|
Testing Premium Features |
All features with free plan |
Some features with free version |
|
Money Back Guarantee |
No | Only in some regions |
Price
PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:
- Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
- Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
- Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
- Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.1
7.7
Siter.io and Framer offer competitive pricing options, with Siter.io scoring slightly higher in terms of price.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free |
Start (Free/month): Includes unlimited teammates, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites are free, and SEO and page speed features are not included. Additionally, it’s not possible to publish any of the websites with the free plan. |
Free (Free/month): Allows 3 websites built on a framer.website subdomain with Framer branding in the footer. Limited to 1,000 traffic visitors and 1,000 CMS items. |
|
$5-$12 |
Solo ($8/month): For 1 website and includes 2 editors, up to 10 pages, 3 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $4 each. Value for price: 6.0 |
Mini ($10/month): Removes Framer branding, allows using a custom domain, includes collaboration with an additional cost for extra editors, custom code embedding, e-commerce support, and limited CMS items. Offers a monthly visitor limit of 2,000 and 1GB bandwidth. Value for price: 6.5 |
|
$12-$24 |
Plus ($14/month): Offers 3 websites with 4 editors, up to 50 pages, 5 forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional editors cost $6 each. Value for price: 7.5 |
Basic ($20/month): Offers all Mini features plus increased limits for CMS items (1,000) and traffic (10,000 visitors per month), along with 10GB bandwidth. Value for price: 7.5 |
|
$20+ |
Pro ($29/month): Provides 5 websites, 6 editors, unlimited pages, unlimited forms, Figma plugin, and SSL certificate. Additional websites cost $8 each. Value for price: 8.5 |
Pro ($30/month): Enhances Basic plan features with a significant increase in CMS items (10,000), traffic (100,000 visitors per month), and bandwidth (100GB), among other advanced features. Value for price: 8.5 |
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.
Hosting quality
Hosting
qualityExamines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:
- Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
- Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
- Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
- Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
3.9
7.1
🏆
Winner: Framer
Framer offers a more reliable hosting service with a 99.9% uptime and an uptime guarantee for enterprise plans. It also provides information about its data centers, which are located in the US, Ireland, and Singapore. On the other hand, Siter.io does not disclose any information about its uptime, uptime guarantee, or data centers, which makes it difficult to assess the quality of its hosting service.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Do they offer hosting? |
Yes, but lacks information on bandwidth, storage limitations, and backup options | Yes, included in all their plans, with 100MB to 100GB SSD storage depending on the plan, and from 3 to 90 day version history |
|
Data Centers: |
Not disclosed |
4 globally: 2 in US, 1 in Ireland, 1 in Singapore |
|
Type of hosting: |
Cloud based hosting | Cloud Hosting |
|
Uptime: |
Not disclosed |
99.9% |
|
Uptime Guarantee: |
Not disclosed |
Only for enterprise plan, 99.99% |
Website Speed Optimization
Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:
- PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
- Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
- Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
- Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
- CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
1.5
7.4
🏆 Winner: Framer
Both Siter.io and Framer prioritize website performance and page speed, but Framer has a higher Website Speed Optimization score and provides more detailed strategies for speed optimization.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Focus |
Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization |
Code Minification, Pre-Rendering, Caching, Image optimization |
|
Performance Tools |
Not disclosed |
Not disclosed |
|
Key Strategies |
Mobile Responsiveness, SEO optimization |
Code Minification, Pre-Rendering, Caching, Image optimization |
|
Load Times |
Not disclosed |
Varies depending on optimization and website complexity |
|
Page Speed Scores Range |
Not disclosed |
Varies depending on optimization and website complexity |
|
Core Web Vitals Improvement |
Not disclosed |
Emphasis on LCP, FID, CLS improvements |
Framer, with a Website Speed Optimization score of 7.4, focuses on code minification, pre-rendering, caching, and image optimization to enhance website speed. It also emphasizes improvements in Core Web Vitals, specifically LCP, FID, and CLS. However, the load times and PageSpeed scores vary depending on the optimization and complexity of the website.
On the other hand, Siter.io, with a Website Speed Optimization score of 1.5, prioritizes mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Unfortunately, Siter.io does not disclose any information about its load times, PageSpeed score ranges, or Core Web Vital improvements.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
No credit card required
Plugins and integrations
Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:
- Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
- Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
- Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
- Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
5.5
7.6
🏆 Winner: Framer.
Framer scores 7.6, offering a variety of plugins that cater to different needs such as forms, video & animation, social media integration, audio, and utility functions. These plugins enhance the functionality of websites created with Framer, allowing users to drag and drop these features onto their web pages, customize them, and connect them to their content or service. On the other hand, Siter.io, with a score of 5.5, offers limited integrations, primarily prioritizing its design capabilities. However, it does support custom code injection, allowing users to incorporate third-party plugins as needed.
Marketing Features
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
2.6
7.2
🏆
Overall Winner: Framer
. Framer offers a more comprehensive set of marketing tools, including SEO tools, email marketing through Mailchimp integration, blogging, social media integration, and advanced analytics and reporting. Siter.io, while offering basic SEO tools, Google analytics integration, and Facebook Pixel integration for ads and promotions, lacks in email marketing and social media integration.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
SEO Tools |
Basic SEO features |
Comprehensive SEO optimization features |
|
Email Marketing |
No |
Yes, through Mailchimp integration |
|
Blogging |
Possible to design a simple blog |
Built-in blogging features |
|
Social Media Integration |
No |
Yes |
|
Analytics and Reporting |
Google analytics integration |
Advanced analytics and reporting |
|
Ads and Promotions |
Facebook Pixel integration |
No |
Customer Support
Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:
- Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
- Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
- Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
- Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
4.1
5.6
🏆 Winner: Framer
. Framer takes the lead in this category with a customer support score of 5.6, compared to Siter.io’s score of 4.1. Both platforms primarily offer self-help options, with Framer providing a community forum and knowledge base, and Siter.io offering an extensive help center and articles. However, Framer edges out Siter.io by offering email support and dedicated support for enterprise customers, even though the details about these services are not provided. Siter.io, on the other hand, does not offer any specific support for enterprise customers.
Security
SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:
- Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
- SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
- Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
- Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
6.8
8.2
🏆
Winner: Framer
. Framer’s security measures are more comprehensive and transparent than Siter.io’s. Framer uses Amazon Web Services for hosting, encrypts data at rest, and classifies data into different categories for better management. They also have secure development practices, external security testing, and a bug bounty program.
On the other hand, Siter.io does not disclose much about its security measures, apart from offering free SSL certificates and employing a zero-knowledge storage system. While these measures are important, they do not provide as much security as Framer’s extensive measures.
AI Capabilities
AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:
- Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
- Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
- AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
- Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0.0
7.6
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
AI Builder |
|
Framer’s AI builder simplifies the process of creating and optimizing web content |
|
AI Ecommerce features |
|
|
|
AI content generation |
|
Framer’s AI enhances website creation with features like AI Translation, Text Rewrite, and Headline Generator |
|
Additional AI features |
|
Framer’s AI Style and AI Photo Generating and Editing tools enhance the versatility and impact of website design |
🏆 Winner: Framer
. Framer, with a score of 7.6, offers several AI features that enhance the process of website creation and optimization. These features include AI Translation for generating localized content, Text Rewrite for enhancing website copy, Headline Generator for crafting compelling content, and AI Style and AI Photo Generating and Editing tools for enhancing the design process.
Siter.io, on the other hand, does not have any AI capabilities. This lack of AI features may limit the functionality and efficiency of the website building process in Siter.io compared to Framer.
User Management
User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:
- Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
permissions. - Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
- Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
levels. - Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.1
7.4
🏆 Winner: Framer
. Both Siter.io and Framer offer real-time collaboration features, but they differ in the number of editors allowed and the roles and access levels provided.
- Siter.io allows 2 to 6 editors depending on the plan, with the option to add more for an extra fee.
- Framer allows up to 5 editors for the Team Basic plan and up to 10 for the Team Pro plan, with additional features like live collaboration, comments, file storage, and extended version history.
Framer User Roles and Access Levels:
| Role | Description | Access Highlights |
|---|---|---|
| Designer | Focuses on the aesthetic and UI/UX aspects of the website. | Can create and modify design elements, utilize animation libraries like Framer Motion, and implement accessibility settings. |
| Content Editor | Manages and curates content for the website, including text, images, and other media. | Can edit CMS content, use localization features for different regions, and modify SEO settings. |
| Developer | Works on more technical aspects, such as custom code and integrations. | Has access to deploy options, can use custom domains, manage project permissions, and apply custom code for further optimization. |
| Project Manager | Oversees the project, coordinating between different roles and ensuring the project meets its deadlines and goals. | Can invite collaborators, assign roles and permissions, and manage versions and rollbacks for efficient site management. |
| Collaborator (General) | A role that can encompass various levels of access based on project needs, including design, content, and deployment tasks. | Access can be customized to include a mix of design, content, and deploy permissions based on the project’s needs and the individual’s role within the team. |
Additional Features
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
SSL Certificate |
|
|
|
Custom Domain |
|
|
|
Free Custom Domain Included |
|
|
|
International Domains |
|
|
|
Mobile Responsive |
|
|
|
Page Speed |
|
|
|
Website Builder Mobile App |
|
|
|
Convert a Website To An App |
|
|
|
Website Analytics |
|
|
|
Multilingual Sites |
|
|
|
Multiple Users |
|
|
User Feedback
Users appreciate Siter.io for its user-friendly interface and robust features, such as the drag-and-drop editor and customizable templates, making website building accessible to teams without coding expertise. However, there’s a consensus that the platform could improve its integration options to enhance workflow efficiency further. Nevertheless, Siter.io effectively addresses the challenge of website creation without coding skills, benefiting designers, small business owners, and individuals seeking to establish an online presence or portfolio quickly and efficiently.
Framer receives high marks for its user-friendly, no-code approach to web and prototype design, offering extensive tutorials, templates, and drag-and-drop functionalities that expedite the design process. Users appreciate its integration with tools like Figma, AI-generated responsive designs, and real-time collaboration features. Critiques focus on a steep learning curve for newcomers and limitations in customer support and features without premium access. Despite these drawbacks, Framer is lauded as a powerful design tool that enhances creativity and efficiency in web development.
The making of this blog
We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.
FAQ
Which platform is better for beginners, Siter.io or Framer?
Can I use both Siter.io and Framer for ecommerce websites?
How do Siter.io and Framer differ in terms of design capabilities?
What are the major differences in pricing between Siter.io and Framer?
Which platform offers better customer support, Siter.io or Framer?
Build a website with AI in one minute
Build a website with AI in one minute
Create your dream website with 10Web AI Builder and take your business online!
